Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“Carolina sniffing around on Jerry Jeudy”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Cam Lawter said:

I'd take Jeudy for a 3rd. TMJ just flat out sucks and I doubt we could find a better WR in the third round with the way Fritterer has been picking. TMJ was a 2nd round pick and Mingo has already taken his spot in his rookie year. 

Can we trade JJ for TMJ straight up. We'll eat the 13m and TMJ can go ride the pine in Denver. Mims looks like the real deal but for whatever reason Peyton won't play him more. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

This is a trade with the future in mind IMO if they do it. Since they lack picks, and may not recruit well in FA this would be a solid move.

Because say its a 3rd, you're not getting a WR equal to Jeudy there. This way you have a proven guy young enough to grow with Bryce, and he's still on a rookie deal with a 5th yr opt avail so the cost is also controlled. 

It’s controlled at 13M for one year. Where you could have a 3rd round rookie at 5-6M. For FOUR years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Toomers said:

I’m sure it would. But the Bengals(or any team) hangs up immediately. What’s the thought process here?

Burns isn’t worth Higgins and a 1st. He’s barely worth either, separately And TMJ sure ain’t worth a 4th. To a Bengal team that has one DE better than Burns already, and another who is well above average. Signed thru 2025 at less than Burns wants, by himself. The Bengals don’t want Burns. 

If you don't think Burns is worth Higgins or a 1st separately, you don't understand how the NFL views pass rushers

The Broncos were able to trade Bradley Chubb and a 5th for a 1st, 4th, and a player, and Burns had 18 more sacks after his first 4 years than Chubb had at that point.  And Chubb had 5.5 sacks in 8 games before being traded during his 5th year, Burns already has 3 sacks after only 4 games during his 5th year.

100% chance a team would be willing to trade more than just a single 1st round pick for Burns this year, it's just a matter of our front office not being stupid this time and taking it.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Varking said:

In the Pro-Juedy defense camp, Juedy is likely better than anything we would draft in the second or third round anyway at WR lol

I will say this, he is probably a better fit in the system we run. He would also likely immediately be the best route runner on the team or maybe a close second to AT. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

If you don't think Burns is worth Higgins or a 1st separately, you don't understand how the NFL views pass rushers

The Broncos were able to trade Bradley Chubb and a 5th for a 1st, 4th, and a player, and Burns had 18 more sacks after his first 4 years than Chubb had at that point.

 

So, Juedy, a 1, and a 4 for Burns? That 1 is going to be a high 1. 

Edited by Wolfcop
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Here is the only way I’m okay with trading for Jeudy (and I don’t even know if it’s possible to do to a 5th year option from a first round contract).

5th round pick for Jeudy AFTER they re-negotiate his $13 million owed to him next year to be a $10 million bonus paid by the Broncos before the trade and this only putting us on the hook for $3 million next year.

Any draft capital better than that and any money more than that on our books and it’s a complete non starter for me.

He is a first round talent who has played like a replacement level player for his whole career, we need to stop going after guys like that.

Not gonna happen.  It’s a seller’s market when it comes to the Panthers and a WR.  There’s just no team out there that doesn’t understand that.  The only way we’re getting a #1 type WR option is to overpay for it.  
 

It’s time to run what ya brung and see where it goes. 

Edited by Newtcase
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wolfcop said:

So, Juedy, a 1, and a 4 for Burns? 

Well, I'd do that one in a heartbeat because that Broncos 1st rounder would allow us to then trade Bryce in the offseason and use their pick to replace him with one of the elite prospects in this upcoming draft as they'll be a Top 5 pick.

But that's also why they won't trade their 1st away, they're already planning on replacing Wilson with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

If you don't think Burns is worth Higgins or a 1st separately, you don't understand how the NFL views pass rushers

The Broncos were able to trade Bradley Chubb and a 5th for a 1st, 4th, and a player, and Burns had 18 more sacks after his first 4 years than Chubb had at that point.  And Chubb had 5.5 sacks in 8 games before being traded during his 5th year, Burns already has 3 sacks after only 4 games during his 5th year.

 

That's going to really depend on how bad Fitts has fugged up this contract situation. If everyone knows we are far apart and aren't a contender for playoffs, then they wait unless they are hoping to make a SB run like the Rams were. Burns makes it to FA, even with the tag, the Panthers have almost zero leverage to negotiate anything. The longer we wait, the weaker we get in terms of trade value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Newtcase said:

Not going happen.  It’s a seller’s market when it comes to the Panthers and a WR.  There’s just no team out there that doesn’t understand that.  The only way we’re getting a #1 type WR option is to overpay for it.  
 

It’s time to run what ya brung and see where it goes. 

I agree, which is why there really are only 2 trades out there that I'd make during this season to go after a WR.

I'd trade Burns to the Lions for Jameson and a 1st or to the Bengals for Higgins and a 1st, but I don't think either of the other sides would do it as I think if the Bengals trade Higgins, they want draft picks, and I don't see the Lions trading for Burns to pay him this summer and then have to pay Hutchinson next summer as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmokinwithWilly said:

That's going to really depend on how bad Fitts has fugged up this contract situation. If everyone knows we are far apart and aren't a contender for playoffs, then they wait unless they are hoping to make a SB run like the Rams were. Burns makes it to FA, even with the tag, the Panthers have almost zero leverage to negotiate anything. The longer we wait, the weaker we get in terms of trade value. 

Nah.... the Panthers leverage in any Burns trade is that other teams will want him.

You could even make the argument that knowing we can't come to a deal with him actually would make teams want to overpay to get him because they know they'll have to battle other interested teams and many would view a pass rusher like him as the final piece to a SB run.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

99.9 the fan broke it down in a holy crap way. We basically traded Jalen Carter(#9 pick), DJ Moore, potentially Caleb Williams/Marvin Harrison jr etc if we keep sucking, and like 2 second round picks for Bryce. 

 

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

bye fitt

I have huge doubts carolina would have picked carter(i had as #1). There was lllloooots of off-field stories making the rounds. Now hes pulling darnold type pressures. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After Bountygate and the information that came out on the Saints owners shielding pedophile priests in New Orleans it will forever be the Saints numero uno for me. FUG THE SAINTS! I hope this is just the beginning of a long term period of suffering for that shitty organization run by even shittier human beings. #2.Pats/Belicheat #3. Falcons (Mike Vick years then Matt Ryan/Julio running it up) Ryan pooping his pants and 28-3 def makes my bad days always better just thinking of those. #4 Pretty much any franchise fan base thats obnoxious Steelers, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Giants, Cowboys, etc.
    • Thank God DM used that #8 pick on a bona fide WR1 and not some bum pass rushing prospect like Stewart or someone else. I believe Tet is legit WR1 material and going forward will be our long term answer at that position since we desperately were in need of one once they traded away DJ Moore.  Tet could possibly end up even being better long term than someone who I respect a ton as a WR in Moore. Evans has been a pleasant surprise and great TE/FB depth piece going forward who could make the most of his opportunities.  Any good offense worth a damn in the NFL has 3 TEs that can do multiple things and being scared by Ian Thomas play for years should makes us all appreciate what Evans is quietly doing as a ROOKIE at one of the hardest positions to learn at the pro level.  Keep cooking DM. This season is not over obviously but seeing some growth out of young talent finally is a breathe of fresh fuggin air for once. 
    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...