Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do the Panthers have a Shotgun problem


Newtcase
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think they call 2 plays on every down. The QB has the power to switch out (kill-kill) when he sees a certain defense. That means the defense shows they are playing the pass when we're in shotgun, they'll probably switch to a run play. But it seems defenses are setting up the QB to do that switch IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's what happens when you run a shotgun offense and have a rookie QB who doesn't take hits well or shots down field. No one respects anything deep and as long as you can keep the pressure on it's an obvious and basic game plan that keeps winning against the Panthers. The deep drop backs are the stuff of dreams for speed rushers and with no respect deep the running game is easily contained. It's not rocket science

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the easiest way for him to see over the line and let lanes develop if he's 5-7 yards back in shotgun. That's why he exclusively operates out of it. We limit our offense a lot because of this. It sucks because we were always so successful being a power run team. I really hope our next coach can salvage Bryce and be more creative. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we run the WC Spread so yeah a lot of what we do is going to be out of the gun. 
 

WC= Quick Reads/Release/Win the Outside

Spread= Spread out the defense

Running it out of gun gets the ball in the QBs hands quicker to make a read since he doesn’t have to drop back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, frankw said:

Reich is poo but it should be fairly obvious at this point some of the offensive scheme is built around Bryce Young's deficiencies that were known before the draft. There's only so much any coach is going to be able to do to compensate for Bryce Young's phsyical limitations. This was the risk with the pick.

You hate Bryce so much, in a thread about play calling you wanted to bring him up to argue he isn’t physically capable of…. Taking a snap under center? 
 

ok man…

Edited by jb2288
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jb2288 said:

Pot calling the… you know what never mind 

You can shout at people like his mom until you're blue in the face it isn't going to make him a franchise quarterback.

Do you honestly think his path to success is to tell him he's doing nothing wrong and everything is going great? How old are you? Legitimately some of you have the mentality of a child. It's baffling.

Enjoy your day bud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

You can shout at people like his mom until you're blue in the face it isn't going to make him a franchise quarterback.

Do you honestly think his path to success is to tell him he's doing nothing wrong and everything is going great? How old are you? Legitimately some of you have the mentality of a child. It's baffling.

Enjoy your day bud.

That was a temper tantrum from what I assume is a grown man I wasn’t expecting. 

is that really what you think is happening? Our coaches are sitting him down after each game and telling him you did everything great and have nothing to work on. What planet are you living on? Your response is just incoherent seethe. Get off the internet for a while 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers have a layered problem beginning with poor coaching poor QB play and poor execution all around.

If the best thing you can do is look around any thread you enter and start scanning for haters instead of identifying issues with the team that do unfortunately heavily involve our rookie QB you do not seek dialogue you seek an echo chamber. Go create your own message board then if this place isn't up to your high standards. The door is that way 👉👋

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We played stout run defenses in New Orleans and Seattle.  If you look at the Minnesota game, they often stacked the line on first down.  As many as 7 players on the line.  Everyone else lined up 10 yards or so from the LOS.  They know our OL is struggling, we have a rookie QB and our receivers can't threaten them deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...