Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article: Frank Reich amidst Panthers' struggles: Brian Burns deserves better


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

Article:

Frustration boiled over for Carolina Panthers outside linebacker Brian Burns on Sunday, when he angrily hit the sideline after a neutral zone infraction on teammate Nick Thurman. The penalty, which came in on a fourth-and-1, gifted the Detroit Lions a first down and added to an already miserable campaign—let alone a miserable day.
 

Reich was asked about his star defender following the 42-24 loss on Sunday. Here’s what he said:

“I cannot say enough about Brian Burns,” Reich replied. “He stands for everything you want a football player to stand for, everything you want a leader to stand for. That guy . . . he’s the epitome of what you want as a winner. That guy is a winner. That’s where you feel bad for guys like that. He’s been here a long time, we’ve not been able to win.

“Everybody deserves better, but he deserves better. And he deserves better. I believe that’s why we’re here, and I believe that it can work out where he can see that.”

Burns has never seen a winning season in the NFL, or anything close to it. The Panthers, since drafting the pass rusher back in 2019, have gone a combined 22-48 over the past five years.

The two-time Pro Bowler would later apologize for displaying his frustration at his locker.
 

But, again, it’s hard to blame Burns considering his situation. We’re now over a month into the season, and he remains without a long-awaited contract extension and—perhaps more simply—a win.

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2023/10/09/panthers-lions-week-5-2023-frank-reich-brian-burns-deserves-better/
 

Edited by WarPanthers89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Burnout189 said:

What he deserves is an award for best magic trick. Dude dissapears and reappears at the worst time during games like frigging magician.

It’s weird because if he keeps his current pace he will end up with 16-17 sacks. I know he gets double teamed a lot but seems to be missing impactful game changing ability throughout the years. I was defending signing Burns to an extension for a long time now but who knows what we end up doing with him now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just ask for a trade and speed this all up. This team is going no where and do you really want to get paid to wallow in the mud with the rest of this mess for years when you could be contending and still getting paid? It's OK. Be a professional and put your career over this dead end. I do wonder what his stats would look like as an edge rusher on a loaded D when he isn't close to the best player.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Just ask for a trade and speed this all up. This team is going no where and do you really want to get paid to wallow in the mud with the rest of this mess for years when you could be contending and still getting paid? It's OK. Be a professional and put your career over this dead end. 

 

This is why many of us feel that it is very possible that Caleb Williams could opt to stay in school for his senior year rather than take the risk of ending up with a franchise like the Chicago Bears. Unless a contender trades up, Williams will still likely end up on a bad franchise in 2025 if he stays at USC. Still, no franchise in the NFL in the Super Bowl Era (1966-to present day) has a worst history of developing young QB's than Chicago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

This is why many of us feel that it is very possible that Caleb Williams could opt to stay in school for his senior year rather than take the risk of ending up with a franchise like the Chicago Bears. Unless a contender trades up, Williams will still likely end up on a bad franchise in 2025 if he stays at USC. Still, no franchise in the NFL in the Super Bowl Era (1966-to present day) has a worst history of developing young QB's than Chicago.

I agree and good for him. The next best move for the Panthers is a crew that will show they can be competent next year and they are going to have to work with a lot of prove it guys given the situation. There isn't a fast fix for this team and even if we still had the #1 coming up there is no sign yet they wouldn't fug it up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarPanthers89 said:

That guy is a winner. That’s where you feel bad for guys like that. He’s been here a long time, we’ve not been able to win.

“Everybody deserves better, but he deserves better. And he deserves better. I believe that’s why we’re here, and I believe that it can work out where he can see that.”

Do you think the Panther realize they are screwed heading into the 2024 draft w/out a #1 pick? Could they be laying the groundwork to justify a trade before the deadline to recoup the lost pick? At this point I don't think Burns would be totally opposed to moving on the greener pastures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • 1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...