Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Bryce Young needs superstars to be successful"


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, NAS said:

I keep hearing this lame argument. What Bryce Young does need is,  at the very least, have AVERAGE wide receivers and average offensive line protection.  We saw yesterday what he can do given at least a window of opportunity.  The image below is very telling, and you can see the one receive that does get separation he's able to find.  Thielen's separation is below league average and he's able to find him.   He doesn't need Tyreek Hill, maybe just one or two more average receivers who could actually play somewhere else.  Let's face it, not sure that Mingo or TMJ would even make any other rosters at this point.  

Bryce has a lot more developing to do, but what I have seen is extremely encouraging.  He will also be able to throw deep when he gets better protection and receivers.  Right now, he really doesn't have many other options.  And yes, he does have physical tools to play in the NFL, and I think those will shine more and more as he gets experience.   There's a lot to be angry about with this team but Bryce Young is going to be a very good QB in this league.

image.png.eb5a981b3d8284dc60fe49320083662f.png

 

 

 

I’ll say anything over 2 yards of separation is NFL open. Could they be more open? Absolutely. But this is more than open enough to complete passes. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Yeah, Tyreek and Waddle are very good. That being said, they were also being covered by our terrible secondary also. I'm pretty sure a lineman at WR would have 3 yards of separation against our DBs.

True.  I'm specifically focused on the 2.94 league average which we're well below.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We do have average WRs.  The Dolphins don't.  The Phins don't even have above average.  They have top tier WRs.   So the contrast is going to be big.  

and yeah, Bryce needs elite weapons.  Because he himself doesn't have elite NFL tools. 

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
  • Poo 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

I’ll say anything over 2 yards of separation is NFL open. Could they be more open? Absolutely. But this is more than open enough to complete passes. 

All things being equal which is why I also think you need adequate protection 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

We do have average WRs.  The Dolphins don't.  The Phins don't even have above average.  They have top tier WRs.   So the contrast is going to be big.  

and yeah, Bryce needs elite weapons.  Because he himself doesn't have elite NFL tools. 

The rest of the league average sepearation is 2.94.  Our top receiver was at 2.35 when he balled out.  So yeah, they're not even average as a unit.  

  • Pie 8
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NAS said:

The rest of the league average sepearation is 2.94.  Our top receiver was at 2.35 when he balled out.  So yeah, they're not even average as a unit.  

yeah, I think the difference there is just playcalling/scheme.  NFL teams largely know the predictable routes we are running over and over.  Makes separation harder.  We do have average WRs.  But life is hard on them because they run the same weak ass crossing routes and outs all game and defense can largely run the routes with them. 

you can't win in the NFL with an opponent knowing what you are doing.  You need comical better talent for the try and stop us approach.  Which is the Frank/Bryce O.  Defenses have been playing it since week 1.  Average WRs are going to have a hard time playing the small ball cross game vs a D playing it. 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

We do have average WRs.  The Dolphins don't.  The Phins don't even have above average.  They have top tier WRs.   So the contrast is going to be big.  

and yeah, Bryce needs elite weapons.  Because he himself doesn't have elite NFL tools. 

So which QBs don't need elite weapons?  Tua, Burrow, Purdy, and Hurts have the best cast around them plus some great coaching.  Stroud is making it work with below average weapons, but a lot of the great ones have elite talent around them.  Outside of AT (who is a 2 or 3 on most teams) we have below average weapons and an OL that is playing terrible.  I want to see Young with a solid OL and actual average weapons with solid coaching. A rookie with a bad OL, below average weapons, and a below average HC isn't going to look very good a majority of the time IMO.  

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, I think the difference there is just playcalling/scheme.  NFL teams largely know the predictable routes we are running over and over.  Makes separation harder.  We do have average WRs.  But life is hard on them because they run the same weak ass crossing routes and outs all game and defense can largely run the routes with them. 

you can't win in the NFL with an opponent knowing what you are doing.  You need comical better talent for the try and stop us approach.  Which is the Frank/Bryce O.  Defenses have been playing it since week 1.  Average WRs are going to have a hard time playing the small ball cross game vs a D playing it. 

It's the perfect sh*tstorm

1. Bad scheme

2. Poor offensive line play

3.  No true #1 WR 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

So which QBs don't need elite weapons?  Tua, Burrow, Purdy, and Hurts have the best cast around them plus some great coaching.  Stroud is making it work with below average weapons, but a lot of the great ones have elite talent around them.  Outside of AT (who is a 2 or 3 on most teams) we have below average weapons and an OL that is playing terrible.  I want to see Young with a solid OL and actual average weapons with solid coaching. A rookie with a bad OL, below average weapons, and a below average HC isn't going to look very good a majority of the time IMO.  

Most need them.  A prime Cam, Lamar, Vick type can win without them.   The more untraditional types. 

and then the elite GOAT types QBs can win without them.  Like a prime Tom Brady, Rodgers could likely win games without superstars.  But in the NFL, most need them. 

and that's just winning games.  Not competing to do something special. 

The argument a rookie Bryce Young of all people didn't or doesn't need them is a comical farce IMO.  Which was pointed out by many leading into this season when people were pimping this Panther PR about how it was going to work to our advantage somehow lol. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Yeah, Tyreek and Waddle are very good. That being said, they were also being covered by our terrible secondary also. I'm pretty sure a lineman at WR would have 3 yards of separation against our DBs.

They're both top 10 WRs in the NFL - frustratingly they're on the same bloody team.

That (and a play calling genius) is what was required to turn Tua into a serviceable QB - it's not really the path I want to go down, there's too many moving parts to get there.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...