Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looking at next year (roster)

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
Just now, *FreeFua* said:

Both Bell and Woods are under contract. No idea why this guy keeps making threads while leaving out a bunch of stuff

That was my fault.  He posted CBs and I read it as secondary.  Yeah like looks like we have 33 players plus 6 draft picks so 39 with 63 plus cap space plus 151 plus cap space in 25 to work with.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Players we have under contract in 2024:

QB: Young/ Dalton

RB: Sanders/ Hubbard

WR: Theilen/ Mingo/ Marshall

TE: Hurst/ Thomas/ Tremble

T: Moton/ Ekwonu/ Ricky Lee

IOL: Bozeman/ Corbett/ Christensen/ Mays/ Zavala/ Jensen

DL: Brown/ Tuttle/ Barno

LB: Thompson/ Cherilus/ DJ Johnson

CB: Jackson/ Horn/ Jamison

S: Bell/ Woods/ Robinson

Special Teams: Hekker/ Pineiro

I’m probably eating the 13ish million in dead money and cutting Donte and Ian to free up 8 million in cap space. We really don’t have that much cap space like people think we do

Miles - 8 mill cap hit 

Shy - 8 mill cap hit 

Hurst - 10 mill cap hit 

Obviously if Burns doesn’t get traded he’s getting tagged  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Didn’t add them because they’re about the only position group with more than 1 starter from this year will still be under contract.  
And not sure how 1 position group on the team is “a lot of stuff”

But thanks for pointing that out I guess

You’re welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, BrisbanePanther said:

Yes, that Burns for Williams + a 1st looks like a very good deal. Especially if it's a 1st for 2024.

No team is trading a WR1 level WR on a rookie deal for a Brian Burns who’s hitting FA at the end of the year and seeking 30 mil per year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrisbanePanther Mentor

BrisbanePanther

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, ncfan said:

No team is trading a WR1 level WR on a rookie deal for a Brian Burns who’s hitting FA at the end of the year and seeking 30 mil per year.

 

1 minute ago, Shotgun said:

I think the days of getting a 1st for Burns are over. 

See, I think this is common sentiment in the Huddle because we are Panthers fans who are accustomed to Dollar Tree-level GM performance.

Every year there seems to be at least one trade where we're shocked see certain players be traded for a bag of beans OR we see a team get a Brinks truck return for a certain player (like the Burns offer). Yet we keep saying that our players won't recoup much or that we have to pay more than we think is reasonable for a player.

If Burns is on Detroit (I'm talking two-years ago Detroit, not this year's good Detroit) no one blinks an eye at a team giving a 1st + a playmaker for him. Same for if he's on Miami or Kansas City or SF or even Tampa--places where credible GMs are in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Mentor

SOJA

Posted
Posted

Re-sign Burns and Luvu and Henderson 

Trade Chinn Donte and Marshall now 

Sign Tee Higgins, Stephon Gilmore, Kendrick Bourne, DJ Reader 

Draft Troy Franklin in second round, CB in the third round, O-line depth in later rounds 

 

Cap will be absolutely maxed but we have to go all in on Bryce's rookie contract 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

I think the days of getting a 1st for Burns are over. 

Burns on the franchise tag for a mid to late first? Maybe. I don't know if anyone gives him what he was looking for i  a contract but that's his issue to deal with. When he is tagged and gets to talk to teams he will hear their pitch.

Or he sits and still doesn't get his ideal money and the Panthers don't get anything except more embarrassment. Or him on the tag money in another year like this one lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • Anybodyhome
      Cellphones

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...