Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: What's wrong with the Carolina Panthers offense?


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ok, PFF has no freaking clue.  Their stats don't even line up with . . . anything.  (I'm not calling out the OP here - just PFF who remain crazy)

42 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

His accuracy rate is one of the highest in the NFL at 63.7%, and his plus-accuracy rate (call it pass attempts with excellent ball location) is also seventh-highest.

Love to know how they measure that.  His completion percentage is 63.2%, which is good for 23rd in the league.  His on target percentage is 73% - good for 23rd among QB's with at least 50 attempts.  His bad throw percentage is 20.9%, good for 31st (again, QB's with at least 50 attempts).  He is 33rd in drops - he's only had three passes dropped all year.

53 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

This is a team that just lacks playmakers. Receivers that can consistently get open and make plays. That makes things tough for Young. Sometimes the post-snap picture is too muddy because there’s nothing for Young to look at, everyone is covered.

Keep seeing this dragged around, and it's just an excuse.  I worked it out a week or so ago.  Our receivers on average have 9 inches less separation than the overall NFL average.  It's not ideal, but it's just not that far off.  Of course you'd like to see your receivers running Travis Kelce open, but that's ALSO not anywhere near the NFL average.

56 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

It would help if the Panthers had a counter-punch in a consistent running game, but they don’t. Miles Sanders has been an abject disappointment after signing a four-year, $25 million contract in the offseason. He’s averaging just a career-low 3.1 yards per carry and his 0.08 missed tackles forced per attempt is sixth-lowest among all ball carriers with at least 25 attempts.

There is a bit of a point here, however, there's more to the story.  100% agree, Sanders has been eleventy kinds of awful this year.  The real story however is that our defense isn't keeping the games close enough for a run game to really take root.  We are next to last in points surrendered per game.  It's very hard to run the ball when you are down multiple scores.

I really despise superficial reporting.  I wish someone would take the time to do real analysis.  C'est la vie.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of words to say our offense has been one of the worst in the NFL and outside of AT, nothing has been great. And y'all can sleep on him but AT has been great. Better than expected for a WR of his age. 

We average 5.5 yards per pass attempt as a team so far in 2023. The last time Carolina was that low was 2010 when we averaged 5.4 for the season. Clausen averaged 5.2 and Bryce is currently averaging 5.3. 

We have a new playcaller tomorrow and Bryce gets more and more experience under his belt each week. I am expecting a pretty good game from him in a game that should be close the entire way.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot of different opinions here. And that's probably what's wrong... too many things not working to the point it seems impossible to fix one and move on. 

Let's see if two weeks of preparation against a team that was demonstrably worse than us last season with a rookie QB and HC will show any improvement.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BrianS said:

Keep seeing this dragged around, and it's just an excuse.  I worked it out a week or so ago.  Our receivers on average have 9 inches less separation than the overall NFL average.  It's not ideal, but it's just not that far off.  Of course you'd like to see your receivers running Travis Kelce open, but that's ALSO not anywhere near the NFL average.

Man, I told you before: in this game of inches, nine inches of separation is huge. That's a big deal. Don't minimize it. 

And, sure, it's average, but that is not the standard we're shooting for. I'd guess that the top tier teams have even more than nine inches. We need a better TE, or at least to start throwing to TEs.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd also add that play calling absolutely matters in terms of receiver separation. The few inches that you gain with pre-snap motions and play action plays could be the difference between a catch made and a pass break up, or a busted play or a big play. All this stuff makes a difference and works together (or not).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...