Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No change since a few weeks ago


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Stomach issues 😣

Haven't changed on that front. Still don't want Tepper doing anything at all without hiring a consultant.

Firing Campen wouldn't require Tepper though. That'd be Reich's call.

 

It would also be unfair, but... 😕

Campen is seen around the League as one of the best line coaches around. Nobody on that staff believes it’s Campens’ fault the guys are failing at their jobs. It’s a scheme issue and Reich should’ve realized it wasn’t going to work a long time ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mc52beast said:

Campen is seen around the League as one of the best line coaches around. Nobody on that staff believes it’s Campens’ fault the guys are failing at their jobs. It’s a scheme issue and Reich should’ve realized it wasn’t going to work a long time ago.

No, It's not his fault. The scheme absolutely doesn't fit.

Unfortunately, that probably won't stop him from getting fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One other observation...

Brian Daboll got everybody's attention last year by hiring outside of his circle. Reich followed suit.

Daboll's Giants are floundering (badly) in his second year. Our team didn't wait that long.

Is that coincidence or causative?

Unknown, but it could be worth noting.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Guy I work with is a huge dolphins fan and he says that what's going on with bryce is exactly what they went through with tua. Speed and a good coach turned everything around

It’s been a huge theme in the NFL when you decide to play these guys before the team is ready. 
 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think sitting Bryce is an option. You can debate whether or not it should be, but I don't think it is.

With a mini-bye this week, there would be an option to try to change the emphasis of the offense to power running since that's what our personnel are better suited for, but I don't know if that's going to happen.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think sitting Bryce is an option. You can debate whether or not it should be, but I don't think it is.

With a mini-bye this week, there would be an option to try to change the emphasis of the offense to power running since that's what our personnel are better suited for, but I don't know if that's going to happen.

Try what you will but we know it is going to be futile. You watched enough Cowboy games to know this is gonna be a 45-0 route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

The ironic thing is Bryce would be cooking in the power run playaction offense Wilks/Mccadoo were running at the end of last season. 

Honestly, probably so. I didn't want to at the time but we should have definitely hired Wilks. He got the team doing the best it could.

This is literally a bullet point guide to how to make us perform as poorly as possible.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

The ironic thing is Bryce would be cooking in the power run playaction offense Wilks/Mccadoo were running at the end of last season. 

Are you sure Wilks would have wanted him?

Pondered elsewhere whether or not it might have been a similar situation to what Wilks had in Arizona where he wanted one quarterback but team brass and ownership insisted on a different one.

Given what we've heard about Tepper, it's not hard to imagine that scenario repeating itself here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...