Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best and worst PFF grades


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Panthering said:

I'm so, so disappointed with Mingo so far.

I'm torn. I get he's a rookie and needs time, but then I think he was a reach where we took him and better players were available. I firmly believe this franchise out thinks the draft every year. Their drafts never align with the 4000 mocks out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/14/2023 at 2:10 PM, Htarnation4.0 said:

I'm torn. I get he's a rookie and needs time, but then I think he was a reach where we took him and better players were available. I firmly believe this franchise out thinks the draft every year. Their drafts never align with the 4000 mocks out there. 

Yeah there are two issues. 

It looks like odds of inconceivable length compounded exponentially, against Bryce Young HOF. Wherever you stand on that ceiling, is one thing.

Whether he can game manage like a point guard, that’s a little different question and apparently the last hope, for when the others are used up. 

I didn’t have any really, of the price being justified. I suppose they can tailor and cater and come up with some extremely hard to watch but mostly effective plans. Yes, even Reich when he gets off of this whatever it is, this experimental phase of shrunken boundary, PacMan looking, anti offense. I am out of ways to denigrate it, but it keeps on feeding me.

That brings me here: if you guys can be trusted, I have some crazy intel, and I have been very conflicted as to how much I should share. They are working hard to perfect an electronic template. I think remote viewing is an element. They are pretty tight lipped though. 

It’s kind of half Houdini half Tom Clancy. Like a passing submarine with GPS, so that you can really “launch” at the target (Russell Wilson is an advisor). 

Word from the inside is “holy poo!!!”. 

 

 

Okay, if I need to say this, here: Just kidding. There is no GPS (it’s more Loran I think). 

Edited by stratocatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...