Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 QB Watch…


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 11/13/2023 at 5:23 PM, 45catfan said:

Ugh, unless he's grown up, he has some serious maturity issues.  I don't keep up withe Gamecock football, but that was a knock on him at Oklahoma.  Maybe he's changed.

I live right next door to Rattler and see all the games and hear all the buzz. He has done nothing at all to warrant any criticism as far as maturity. He has been a model citizen, player, leader and team representative. The young man has matured and been a solid all around student athlete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

As I see it, one more deeper for 2025 because there's no way Tepper will sign off on a QB at #33 in April.

True, but unless he transfers, this most likely keeps Arch Manning from starting at Texas. And Manning is someone people have been hoping would be the next great QB for a few years now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

With Ewers and maybe McCarthy returning, I anticipate Ward and Pratt hype trains developing.  

I am higher on Ewers than McCarthy.  McCarthy had everything a QB could ever need a Michigan: WRs, RBs and a stellar OL.  I don't see him as a QB that can put an inferior offense on his back and carry them in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
    • Canales has never been part of big YAC offenses in the NFL.  That’s not his tree.  Not in Seattle, Tampa or here.  Every O he has been associated with basically has been bottom half of the league in YAC.  That’s what Bryce needs to happen though  2 very different things….and very much gets into why the middle school QB doesn’t fit 
×
×
  • Create New...