Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you watch CJ Stroud and wonder ‘what if’?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Varking said:

Oh gee golly gosh… I just finished stopping an armed robbery and I raced to check the Huddle. I see your previous posts using love, and then you mentioned me and another user dating and now you’re asking me to ask you out? It’s all too soon and too public. Let’s wait another four comments or so when I feel like we are obsessed with each other and then go from there, boo boo. 

I’m on my way to the hospice house you wanna ride with?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Judo Thoreau said:

To OP: no, I don’t wonder. If Bryce vanished days before the draft, we’d have taken Richardson. No doubt in my mind that he was the #2 option. Stroud was probably removed from our board after the S2 fiasco if Tepper had a say in it. 

Yeah I’m of the belief Richardson was the backup pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

One of those games was because of Young’s 26-yard run putting us well over 100. Funny thing — he still has the only 22+ yard run this season by a Panther, and it’s one of a whopping two 20+ yard runs 

Well you said you wished Carolina could have 150 yards rushing in a way that implied if Bryce got run support then the story might be different.  So I simply gave you the evidence that the lack of run support over the season has been equally bad in most respects.  Typically, a poster like you abandons their original argument and makes a new one, this time about Bryce helping his own rushing stats.  So dumb and lazy…Bryce has 135 yards rushing against CJs 78.  I’m sure you’ll convince yourself those 57 yards tell a hidden story only you can see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Newtcase said:

Well you said you wished Carolina could have 150 yards rushing in a way that implied if Bryce got run support then the story might be different.  So I simply gave you the evidence that the lack of run support over the season has been equally bad in most respects.  Typically, a poster like you abandons their original argument and makes a new one, this time about Bryce helping his own rushing stats.  So dumb and lazy…Bryce has 135 yards rushing against CJs 78.  I’m sure you’ll convince yourself those 57 yards tell a hidden story only you can see.

Do you think we'd have only 1 win if we had a RB rush for 150 yards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
    • Sorry, but this is a terrible breakdown that doesn't at all show what you're trying to say/project about T-Mac next year, as it leaves out key information that changes everything, it makes the opposite point that you're trying to. Chase missed 5 games that second season after playing all 17 as a rookie (and still saw more targets that second season). Puka it looks like you projected his stats out to a 17 game season (as he only played 11 games), but even still , when you have 160+ targets as a rookie, there isn't really much room to get any more the next year. Waddle saw an increase in yards, and sure, his targets went down, but he played on a team with a better WR that year who saw 170 targets for 1,710 yards during that 2nd season for Waddle... something T-Mac doesn't have to contend with on the same team (280+ targets for their top 2 WRs, if you don't think T-Mac would see more than 122 targets if him and Coker combined for 287, then you're nuts). Then Olave and Wilson both saw an increase of 19 targets in their second season. You basically just laid out the reasoning for why T-Mac should see at least 20 more targets next year, if not more, which would be a solid increase and put him easily into the Top 10 most targeted WR next season.
×
×
  • Create New...