Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bills run game (and why we're absolutely awful schematically)


lightsout
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, lightsout said:

Watching this Bills offense work, and man it is night and day. Forgetting the talent they have at RB, and across the board really, they do some very simple but effective things up front.

There isn't a question of who has who. They're running iso, fb lead ups, and some power. They're running the exact offense we need to be running but with good blocking and guys executing at a high level.

 

When I think about our own run game, it's almost entirely zone. Nothing wrong with zone...except when there is. You see, a lot of zone blocking depends on communication amongst the line. Each man needs to know what their responsibilities are, but then also what the man to either side of them will be doing so they know how to scale. A guard expecting a chip from his tackle will take a softer bucket step so he gets a bit more drive, depending on the chip to help get his hips around. When the tackle thinks he's free running second level instead....you get runs blown up at the line. 

Our best runs this season have been off of an iso and, iirc, a trap. Designed to be simple, you have a specific man you must block in a specific way. No guess work, just know the damn play and execute.

We have linemen we can't trust to get their assignments sorted out for inside zone and stretch work. Ron was awful at a lot, but his offenses always had basic concepts reigning supreme. Iso, power, blast/belly, trap. Our run game misses this, and the reason we do it is to set up the rpo....which we don't run really. Bryce hasn't had a single rpo called that I can remember. So we're giving a zone look in the run game to mask our rpo later and doing fuging nothing with either.

Just a fun aside while you're watching two functional offenses.

You realize we're very limited on what we can run out of shotgun right?  

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, toldozer said:

You realize we're very limited on what we can run out of shotgun right?  

Their answer was to run RPOs. I eagerly await those results. /s

No over the top ability and shotgun & pistol only equals a really hard time run successfully, even if the oline wasn't having a huge regression.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, toldozer said:

You realize we're very limited on what we can run out of shotgun right?  

 

I get the snarkiness here and love it but it makes me mad because you can run folds, you can run iso and power, you can run everything except tosses with the same timing and momentum as you can from under center and yet we keep doing stupid poo lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

We don't have the right kind of linemen to run a zone scheme, especially on the left, but we're trying to do it anyway.

I wonder why this hasn't been brought up more. We drafted/signed a bunch of road graders and want them to be dancing bears in a zone scheme. I guarantee with Ickey bearing down run play after run play, these linebacker sized DEs wouldn't just run around him on passing downs. I can guarantee cause we saw it last year. 

Why don't you think they are running close to the same scheme? I mean it worked with PJ at QB and he's almost exact same height as Bryce. I just don't get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthTryon said:

I wonder why this hasn't been brought up more. We drafted/signed a bunch of road graders and want them to be dancing bears in a zone scheme. I guarantee with Ickey bearing down run play after run play, these linebacker sized DEs wouldn't just run around him on passing downs. I can guarantee cause we saw it last year. 

Why don't you think they are running close to the same scheme? I mean it worked with PJ at QB and he's almost exact same height as Bryce. I just don't get it. 

It's been brought up by several analysts and someone (Sheena Quick I think) asked a question about it in Reich's most recent press conference. His response was that they had no intention of going "smashmouth".

Whether it's come up internally or not though, no idea.

I do know that Diana Russini said Panthers brass are trying to get Reich to run something closer to Young's college offense (more RPOs and such).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pro-I still works as a base offense. I know it isn't as flashy as the spread everybody went to, but with edge players trending smaller and faster, you'd have a field day smashing them in the face with power.

RPO is a neat gimmick...that generates as many illegal man down field penalties as it does big gains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, lightsout said:

 

I get the snarkiness here and love it but it makes me mad because you can run folds, you can run iso and power, you can run everything except tosses with the same timing and momentum as you can from under center and yet we keep doing stupid poo lol

I'm not being snarky. We 100% picked the wrong qb based on our oline personnel.  I don't know how people that get paid money to evaluate talent couldn't see that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, toldozer said:

I'm not being snarky. We 100% picked the wrong qb based on our oline personnel.  I don't know how people that get paid money to evaluate talent couldn't see that

 

CJ would be just as bad with all else being equal. No rookie QB can succeed with what we have been doing and who we've been doing it with. Dalton looked decent because Dalton is multi time pro bowler. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lightsout said:

 

CJ would be just as bad with all else being equal. No rookie QB can succeed with what we have been doing and who we've been doing it with. Dalton looked decent because Dalton is multi time pro bowler. 

We wouldn't be running everything out of the gun with stroud so all things wouldn't be equal 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...