Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Athletic: Panthers Issues, Bryce, Reich, & More (Vid/Audio)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

The personnel not aligning to the offense is the trump card for the year though.  That takes the cake on poor decisions. We were trying to aspire to a McVay type offense yet we draft Mingo, give up picks for DJJ, and ignore 5+ absolute burners in this draft when we had no shifty guy. 

Front office people don't determine systems. That's solely coaching.

More to the point though, Reich came in talking about tailoring the scheme to the personnel rather than the other way around.

That should have happened from the beginning. It could have been done at the bye. Hell, it could be done inbetween last Thursday's game and the next one.

But at least based on press conference answers, I don't know that it will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Young has the same problem Tua and Mac Jones have.  Average at best NFL arm.  So what's the difference?

With Jones, they look an awful lot like the same player if we're being honest.

With Tua, the difference is the talent.  Tua had similar problems before his roster got absolutely STACKED with receivers.  With the receivers he now has, Tua doesn't have to throw to "NFL Open" receivers.  He's effectively doing exactly what he did in college - throw to guys who are gapping their defenders so bad it looks like the SEC.  Put any kind of stress on that offense at all, and Tue regresses to below average.

Bryce has had opportunities to throw to "NFL Open" receivers.  Plenty of opportunities if we're being honest.  He hesitates.  Or he's not set and ready to throw when the opportunity is there.  Take your pick of the two.

I haven't watched a lot this year but I saw guys who had over the top of the D who looked like they were not concerned and those shots were not taken. Either he can't see it or he won't try. Tua also doesn't look like a post season threat yet on that stacked team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Bryce has had opportunities to throw to "NFL Open" receivers.  Plenty of opportunities if we're being honest.  He hesitates.  Or he's not set and ready to throw when the opportunity is there.  Take your pick of the two.

That criticism has been .ade in a couple of places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what bugs the hell out of me regarding the line scheme mismatch.

Analysts see it.

Some reporters see it.

Hell, even fans see it.

There's no way somebody on the coaching staff has not seen this.

James Campen is certainly someone I'd expect to know the difference between a zone and a man/power scheme. And I find it hard to believe he's the only one on a staff full of experienced coaches.

If anybody's talking about it internally, we likely wouldn't know, but we can sure as hell see nothing's been done about it...at least not so far.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Here's what bugs the hell out of me regarding the line scheme mismatch.

Analysts see it.

Some reporters see it.

Hell, even fans see it.

There's no way somebody on the coaching staff has not seen this.

James Campen is certainly someone I'd expect to know the difference between a zone and a man/power scheme. And I find it hard to believe he's the only one on a staff full of experienced coaches.

If anybody's talking about it internally, we likely wouldn't know, but we can sure as hell see nothing's been done about it...at least not so far.

That has bugged me for weeks. All I hear is they want to make changes but not adjustments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Here's what bugs the hell out of me regarding the line scheme mismatch.

Analysts see it.

Some reporters see it.

Hell, even fans see it.

There's no way somebody on the coaching staff has not seen this.

James Campen is certainly someone I'd expect to know the difference between a zone and a man/power scheme. And I find it hard to believe he's the only one on a staff full of experienced coaches.

If anybody's talking about it internally, we likely wouldn't know, but we can sure as hell see nothing's been done about it...at least not so far.

Round peg square hole is gonna be this staff’s downfall.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Here's what bugs the hell out of me regarding the line scheme mismatch.

Analysts see it.

Some reporters see it.

Hell, even fans see it.

There's no way somebody on the coaching staff has not seen this.

James Campen is certainly someone I'd expect to know the difference between a zone and a man/power scheme. And I find it hard to believe he's the only one on a staff full of experienced coaches.

If anybody's talking about it internally, we likely wouldn't know, but we can sure as hell see nothing's been done about it...at least not so far.

We truly don’t know the extent David Tepper is meddling with the coaching staff. Whose decision was it to give playcalling to Thomas Brown? I really really hope he isn’t making X’s and O’s Decisions but he’s choosing QBs apparently so who knows 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Daeavorn said:

They used that stupid S2 test and convinced themselves that Bryce's intellect, which may be greater than average, makes up for his below average physical attributes. It's pretty impressive how that many experienced football guys all made the same mistake.

Bryce was considered the #1 QB prospect long before the S2 test came out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Front office people don't determine systems. That's solely coaching.

More to the point though, Reich came in talking about tailoring the scheme to the personnel rather than the other way around.

That should have happened from the beginning. It could have been done at the bye. Hell, it could be done inbetween last Thursday's game and the next one.

But at least based on press conference answers, I don't know that it will be.

But wouldn’t the front office know what system/scheme the coach they hire would run? If they knew, it’s their fault. If they didn’t ask, also their fault. It is such a mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Here's what bugs the hell out of me regarding the line scheme mismatch.

Analysts see it.

Some reporters see it.

Hell, even fans see it.

There's no way somebody on the coaching staff has not seen this.

James Campen is certainly someone I'd expect to know the difference between a zone and a man/power scheme. And I find it hard to believe he's the only one on a staff full of experienced coaches.

If anybody's talking about it internally, we likely wouldn't know, but we can sure as hell see nothing's been done about it...at least not so far.

What bugs me is that nobody from the media is asking Frank those questions. It should be the first thing to ask. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Front office people don't determine systems. That's solely coaching.

More to the point though, Reich came in talking about tailoring the scheme to the personnel rather than the other way around.

That should have happened from the beginning. It could have been done at the bye. Hell, it could be done inbetween last Thursday's game and the next one.

But at least based on press conference answers, I don't know that it will be.

Many GMs work with coaches with a distinct vision in mind so there's trust and an agreed upon idea of the players they target vs. don't.  That's league wide.  Seems like we still just don't have an agreed upon framework and the guys that fit that...or they really thought they sufficiently addressed what they needed to.

They knew all the right things to say but didn't actually do it.  So it tells me rather than this being willful ignorance out of pride, this is them thinking they can make this happen with the players they have.  So it's a miss in evaluation on the front end and coaching on the back.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Martin said:

But wouldn’t the front office know what system/scheme the coach they hire would run? If they knew, it’s their fault. If they didn’t ask, also their fault. It is such a mess.

The OL was already built when he got here. No indication he wanted to retool it. Zavala was drafted as depth.

Reich stated that his preference was to tailor the scheme to the players. He's not doing it and I can't imagine why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

Many GMs work with coaches with a distinct vision in mind so there's trust and an agreed upon idea of the players they target vs. don't.  That's league wide.  Seems like we still just don't have an agreed upon framework and the guys that fit that...or they really thought they sufficiently addressed what they needed to.

They knew all the right things to say but didn't actually do it.  So it tells me rather than this being willful ignorance out of pride, this is them thinking they can make this happen with the players they have.  So it's a miss in evaluation on the front end and coaching on the back.  

See above. They made no effort to retool the line that was already built. There's not really even any evidence that they thought about it.

When James Campen was hired in San Diego, front office specifically stated that they were going to let him dictate what blocking scheme they ran. He looked at the personnel and decided zone blocking was the best fit.

It's clearly not the best fit here, and I can't imagine Campen doesn't know that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

See above. They made no effort to retool the line that was already built. There's not really even any evidence that they thought about it.

When James Campen was hired in San Diego, front office specifically stated that they were going to let him dictate what blocking scheme they ran. He looked at the personnel and decided zone blocking was the best fit.

It's clearly not the best fit here, and I can't imagine Campen doesn't know that.

Sure.  What you said is fine, but seems like an independent point from what I'm saying.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...