Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CFB conference championship games

LinvilleGorge

By LinvilleGorge,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Next season will be better. 12 teams right? Or is it 8.

12

12 is a good number. Doesn't matter how many teams are in, there's always going to be teams with a legit argument they got snubbed from the field but if you're on the bubble of a 12 team playoff you don't have a realistic shot anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoKnows Veteran

WhoKnows

Posted
Posted

WTF do you go for it on 4th and 7 in FG range for you opponent when you have 3 timeouts left? You are down 7 so you’re giving FSU a 10 point lead if you don’t get it. I don’t get not punting and hoping your D stops them and you call 3 timeout but you are only down 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Nope im right. I always get these rankings right.

 

FSU is not currently a top 4 team in the country. Voters will penalize them for not having their starting QB. It's really that simple.

Guess we will find out to tomorrow at noon

And you have been consistently wrong for some time now

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

And the converse of that is the other 1-loss teams lost games they should have won.

This. I mean, Ohio St lost just once. To the best team in the country. GA lost just once ... last game of the season (an "extra" game not even historically played), Bama lost just once, Texas lost just once. What is the criteria?

FSU is in. They have zero losses. Michigan is in. Washington is in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • Anybodyhome
      Cellphones

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...