Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What happens from here


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Knowing Tepper he doubles down and fails again next year. I haven't seen any signs yet that he is capable of stumbling over competency. Or will allow it to flourish near his toxic management style. 

Maybe after that he will deal with his ego and try this entire thing in a competent way. I just wish he had another toy to play with so he would take his focus off of this one. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Daeavorn said:

Everything hinges on how Tepper handles this next head coaching search. All the dirty laundry is fully available and people now know exactly how much of a meddler he is.

This is going to be interesting.

He needs to "handle it" by keeping his ass out of it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Knowing Tepper he doubles down and fails again next year. I haven't seen any signs yet that he is capable of stumbling over competency. Or will allow it to flourish near his toxic management style. 

Maybe after that he will deal with his ego and try this entire thing in a competent way. I just wish he had another toy to play with so he would take his focus off of this one. 

You know he's gotta be absolutely nuclear level pissed over this story being out there.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't talk about the player level because that's really subject to who the coach is...

But DJ Chark and Brad Bozeman were both quoted in Person and Russini's article. Bozeman specifically confirmed the long-held speculation that the blocking scheme were using doesn't fit his style, as well as that of others.

I like Bozeman a lot and what's happened this year isn't his fault, but I have to wonder if he hasn't just written his ticket out of Carolina.

Chark probably doesn't give a sh-t. Pretty sure he was on a one-year contract anyway.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only sensible option would be for me to run the team from the huddle message board as a GM/HC. 

Day 1 - I'm trading for every Clemson Tiger in the league.  No matter the cost.  That's right folks, Trevor Lawerence is coming to town. 

Day 2 - I will add one Gamecock to keep that masses from being able to claim I only sought Clemson players.   Clearly, that couldn't be true if I bring Captain Munnerlyn out of retirement to be my 5th string DB.  Don't question the move, keep in mind I had to get Trevor Lawerence and company so my resources are slim.  And yes, yes, NC,  I will represent your teams by adding 1 player from UNC.  It will be whoever the random player is that you moan about shouldn't even make the league.  Well, he shouldn't but resources are slim and I'll have to pay a lot of guys the league min.  But that's it from NC. 

Day 3 - unlike prior admins, I will embrace the Keep Pounding motto like no one has ever done.   I'll wear it on my gameday shirt.  I will often ask people why they hate Sam Mills as my response to any questioning of decisions I make if I happen to be wearing said shirt.  FYI - I will always wear my Keep Pounding merch.  

Draft - Huddle poll.  Boom.  If CFP has a committee that decides championships that often include random people like politicians, sports writers and the likes.....well, why not you!  The good people!

Gameday - I'm new age.  Forward thinking.  A different breed.  I'm like the Miami HC but even crazier.  I'm bringing my recliner and case of beer to the sideline.  By the 4th quarter and 10 beers in I should be at my peak of gameday management.  I'll be calling all sorts of creative stuff. 

Press Conferences - I ain't got time for that.  I'll need to here on the huddle complaining about the Panthers

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

You know he's gotta be absolutely nuclear level pissed over this story being out there.

Him being angry is the new standard. I have no idea what it's going to take to make him turn the corner but I sure would love to see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...