Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's an organizational problem


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

I still think the football component is just a toy aspect for the billionaire and his wife.  It's their bonus fun. And they are enjoying themselves with their Madden-like management. They invested in a sports franchise to diversify and grow their wealth.  That was and is the reason they are here.  Which it has done in the short time he has owned the team.   In fact, it is mind boggling how good these investments are for the mega rich.  It makes that Frank/Rhule money flushed down the drain mere play money in reality. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I still think the football component is just a toy aspect for the billionaire and his wife.  It's their bonus fun. And they are enjoying themselves with their Madden-like management. They invested in a sports franchise to diversify and grow their wealth.  That was and is the reason they are here.  Which it has done in the short time he has owned the team.   In fact, it is mind boggling how good these investments are for the mega rich.  It makes that Frank/Rhule money flushed down the drain mere play money in reality. 

At some point the abysmal failure has to either get old or get embarrassing or both. Surely failing this miserably has to stop being fun at some point.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is amazing how one person can create such controversy that extends into at least 2 states and impacts millions of people. And yet this person is completely oblivious that he is the problem causing the controversy. If he left the Carolina’s and the Panthers millions would cheer and celebrate. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

fuging yes dude, the whole "we are one move away" has plagued us since he took over. In fact if he had just been patient and sucked ass our very first year with Rhule we would have ended up with Trevor Lawrence 

At this point this team needs a complete rebuild outside of 

definite keepers: 95, 49, 72

either sign him or trade him: 0

needs more time: 9, 8, 79, 15

And that's pretty much it, every other position could be argued that it needs to be either upgraded or at minimum needs quality depth 

I would focus heavily on building up the offensive line this offseason as well as the WR corps. 

But most importantly, above all else, we will never be succesful much less even mediocre if David Tepper continues to meddle. No one can do their job effectively with a boss breathing down their neck making asinine and ridiculous suggestions. No one will want to come here to work for him. 

The issue is I don't see this happening 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SOJA said:

fuging yes dude, the whole "we are one move away" has plagued us since he took over. In fact if he had just been patient and sucked ass our very first year with Rhule we would have ended up with Trevor Lawrence 

At this point this team needs a complete rebuild outside of 

definite keepers: 95, 49, 72

either sign him or trade him: 0

needs more time: 9, 8, 79, 15

And that's pretty much it, every other position could be argued that it needs to be either upgraded or at minimum needs quality depth 

I would focus heavily on building up the offensive line this offseason as well as the WR corps. 

But most importantly, above all else, we will never be succesful much less even mediocre if David Tepper continues to meddle. No one can do their job effectively with a boss breathing down their neck making asinine and ridiculous suggestions. No one will want to come here to work for him. 

The issue is I don't see this happening 

We are in fact one move away. When the for sale sign goes up, Dave finally made the right move. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’re beating a dead horse at this point. We know it’s Tepper. It starts at the top. Every year he has been the owner the team has gotten worse with the lone exception being Steve Wilks’s short tenure. We’d all be better served spending our time focused on something more productive on Sundays. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SOJA said:

fuging yes dude, the whole "we are one move away" has plagued us since he took over. In fact if he had just been patient and sucked ass our very first year with Rhule we would have ended up with Trevor Lawrence 

At this point this team needs a complete rebuild outside of 

definite keepers: 95, 49, 72

either sign him or trade him: 0

needs more time: 9, 8, 79, 15

And that's pretty much it, every other position could be argued that it needs to be either upgraded or at minimum needs quality depth 

I would focus heavily on building up the offensive line this offseason as well as the WR corps. 

But most importantly, above all else, we will never be succesful much less even mediocre if David Tepper continues to meddle. No one can do their job effectively with a boss breathing down their neck making asinine and ridiculous suggestions. No one will want to come here to work for him. 

The issue is I don't see this happening 

You assume he would have actually allowed the drafting of Lawrence, he would have waited until the last week and then forced Mac Jones.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hepcat said:

We’re beating a dead horse at this point. We know it’s Tepper. It starts at the top. Every year he has been the owner the team has gotten worse with the lone exception being Steve Wilks’s short tenure. We’d all be better served spending our time focused on something more productive on Sundays. 

Our best runs of "success" under Tepper was his first year of ownership when he said he would focus on the business side of the house in year one before "putting his stamp" on the football side of the house and Wilks' interim run when Tepper had likely written off the current season and was simply focusing on the future. He should realize that the less he meddles in the present time the better the results are on the field.

How would he react if a football coach or football front office person came strutting into his office telling him all about how they'd run a hedge fund? He'd laugh in their face and tell them to GTFO and stay in their lane which is exactly what he needs to tell himself on football matters.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Our last coach openly talked about the weekly meetings with Tepper and how Tepper is a very involved owner before being fired. Tepper's influence on personnel decisions and meddling down to the level of individual play calls is widely rumored at this point.

Hasn’t the weekly meeting been a thing since he got here? 
Rivera and Rhule both said they would have weekly meetings. 
I don’t know why people are making a big deal out of this. 
I am very certain other teams HC have weekly meetings. We are not unique. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the honesty in your posts--I am not sure Canales is rusing(?) because I don't think we are good enough yet to draft players for depth on day 1.  I do think we are in limbo, fwiw.  At 19, I think you are drafting second rounders in the first.
    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
×
×
  • Create New...