Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bored, here are some Matt Moore stats


Swarly

Recommended Posts

Bored, so I decided to do some math and figure out what Matt Moores stats MIGHT have been had he started the whole year based off of the 5 games he started.

In 5 games, these are his stats:

79 Att, 126 Completions, 990yds, 62.7 Completion %, 8TD, 1INT, 104.9 rating

Stretched out over a 16 game season, this is what I came up with.

403 ATT, 253 Completions, 3168yds, 62.7%, 23 TDs, 4 ints, 102 rating

Now my math might not be perfect, but the numbers seem about right(the only ones that might be off are the completion %, and passer rating). His stats are kinda skewed on the NFL/ESPN stats page because of that game mid-season where he took over for Delhomme and threw an int, so I only included the 5 games he started.

Again, this is a big what-if situation had he stayed consistent, but just thought I'd do the math to pass some time :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bored, so I decided to do some math and figure out what Matt Moores stats MIGHT have been had he started the whole year based off of the 5 games he started.

In 5 games, these are his stats:

79 Att, 126 Completions, 990yds, 62.7 Completion %, 8TD, 1INT, 104.9 rating

Stretched out over a 16 game season, this is what I came up with.

403 ATT, 253 Completions, 3168yds, 62.7%, 23 TDs, 4 ints, 102 rating

Now my math might not be perfect, but the numbers seem about right(the only ones that might be off are the completion %, and passer rating). His stats are kinda skewed on the NFL/ESPN stats page because of that game mid-season where he took over for Delhomme and threw an int, so I only included the 5 games he started.

Again, this is a big what-if situation had he stayed consistent, but just thought I'd do the math to pass some time :D

Yeah the NFL's not consistent enough to proect stats. But since your not projecting his stats to prove he's better than someone else ur cool.

He had a lot of dropped INTs but got a lot better the more he threw so I think as long as the running game is by his side I think he'll be efficient but not productive. Even if he has a high rating he's almost a lock to get snubbed from the pro-bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the NFL's not consistent enough to proect stats. But since your not projecting his stats to prove he's better than someone else ur cool.

He had a lot of dropped INTs but got a lot better the more he threw so I think as long as the running game is by his side I think he'll be efficient but not productive. Even if he has a high rating he's almost a lock to get snubbed from the pro-bowl.

what QB doesnt get lucky with dropped INT's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what QB doesnt get lucky with dropped INT's?

i don't have the tape anymore but he was missing wide open guys and making some doo doo throws early in the NE game. Vikes was a little slow too. He looked more composed the more the season and his games wore on. Hopefully he just needed some starts to help him calm down. There's no way fox doesn't start him. I'll whip out my pitchfork if he does(I don't have one so I'll have to use a shovel).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't have the tape anymore but he was missing wide open guys and making some doo doo throws early in the NE game. Vikes was a little slow too. He looked more composed the more the season and his games wore on. Hopefully he just needed some starts to help him calm down. There's no way fox doesn't start him. I'll whip out my pitchfork if he does(I don't have one so I'll have to use a shovel).

My parents own a farm I can get all we need. You bring the torches and I'll meet you there. Someone else will have to supply the tar and feathers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...