Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best and worst PFF grades


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, AU-panther said:

One of them graded in the 60s, which isn’t that high, which he didn’t have much competition to be in the top 5.

Also you do realize when a sack or pressure is given up it usually isn't the fault of the entire line. 
that’s the entire point of off, they watch each player on each play, whereas most fans such as yourself just watch the ball and when you see a sack you start complaining about the entire line. 

 

Clearly you are not got at detecting sarcasm and havent been paying attention to a lot of my post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ickey still getting beat like a drum on pass plays. Surprised he isn't in the bottom 5 he whiffs on so many blocks its really alarming. He has 1 or 2 plays a game where he doesnt even get a hand on the player.

And wow Huddle Game day favorite Mingo in the bottom 5 yet I'm not seeing Young who, from a stats perspective, had his worst game as a professional and received all of the Huddles blame for the offense on Sunday. There were a lot of drops and our WRs are so slow compared to watching other WRs in the NFL. I'm not sure if any of you watch teams outside of the Panthers, I'm not sure how you wouldn't be by now with yet another poo season on our hands, but it's pretty obvious to me. We lack speed and guys that can make plays after the catch. We have to find 1-2 players with that ability by next year.

And we have got to figure out the oline issues at LT and LG. We've had some solid  performances at the RG spot this year but LT and mostly LG have been a disaster all year long. Good to see Mayes have a solid performance at LG hopefully he can keep building on that but we definitely need at minimum 2 or 3 new starters by next season.

Edited by Mr Mojo Risin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Well we can't do much about that now. That was a Matt Rhule thing.

The point being that we refused to recognize the strengths/weaknesses of our players. 

Oh, that cannot be denied. The way this roster was constructed on offense mirrors the way the coaching staff was put together. A hodge-podge of mis-matching parts forced into roles they're not suited for.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...