Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LaCanfora Hearing that Scott will be Gone


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

There's no way Fitt or anyone in this front office should still have a job.

Worst team in the league by far (which, considering the level of sick not just in division, but in conference is quite an accomplishment) and you traded away your first pick....you sold the farm for the first pick and the coaching staff you hired smell of the hunger games, then your head coach gets fired and the whole coaching staff you spent mega millions on us a getting fired too?

Wow what a failure. Probably the worst failure in the history of the league.

I know it's on Tepper, but the heads that roll on this (and there will be) dont belong to the owner and his wife.

Can't sign on to that, but I understand it.

As far as the GM specifically though...

What the Panthers currently have right now is a level of dysfunction that's as high as it's ever been. I'd not seen evidence that Fitterer was part of that problem...till this year.

As far as personnel, I still don't feel like he can be judged fairly given the interference of both Rhule and Tepper, but that doesn't matter anymore.

Whether he could have helped build a winning roster is no longer relevant. He helped backstab his head coach.

You can't keep him after that.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2023 at 12:34 PM, SuperBowlBound said:

I’ll keep reiterating it - Tepper had better not retain 1 single person in that front office. Keeping anyone associated with this comedy of errors will show he hasn’t learned a damn thing. 

I agree completely - but removing them all, hiring all new, and still failing shows the problem is HIM.  And often that is why "B" players do this....cause they want to be able to blame someone else and aren't capable of making the right decisions that aren't selfish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stingray3030 said:

I agree completely - but removing them all, hiring all new, and still failing shows the problem is HIM.  And often that is why "B" players do this....cause they want to be able to blame someone else and aren't capable of making the right decisions that aren't selfish.

It might actually happen, though is personally prefer to keep Adrian Wilson, Samit Suleiman and maybe a few others.

But I feel like that decision needs to be left up to the new GM, not Tepper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stingray3030 said:

Agreed - but will Tepper listen to anyone regardless?  Seems like he won't

No idea, but the hope is that he gets someone he will listen to.

That's one of my main reasons for supporting Brandon Hunt, even though I think Will McClay likely has a better resumé.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...