Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With Panthers cleaning house how safe is Bryce


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

Safe, I dont know how a team would give up more than a late 2nd for him after this season and for what we paid for him we may aswell let him battle it out in camp with whoever they bring along. I hope he realizes his subpar performance and is off training with Mingo and company all spring. Please bring back Ish Smith Marsette too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

I think it could be very possible hes moved now, if a new GM is convinced he's not the guy, while his value still might be sort of high. 
 I am worried they ONLY hire someone who is convinced he is the guy though. 
 

 

How is bryces value even remotely high? Maybe a late round pick lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frank9999 said:

I think it could be very possible hes moved now, if a new GM is convinced he's not the guy, while his value still might be sort of high. 
 I am worried they ONLY hire someone who is convinced he is the guy though. 

Wouldn't bet on him being moved.

Person pointed out that would require Tepper admitting he was wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wouldn't bet on him being moved.

Person pointed out that would require Tepper admitting he was wrong.

Dude tepper firing everyone after this season is already admitting he was wrong. I think too much is being made of this supposed attachment to Bryce. 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Person pointed out that would require Tepper admitting he was wrong.

well, in fairness, Tepper has admitted to being wrong about a lot of his decisions and moved on quick.

he fired Ron, Hurney, Rhule, Frank, Fitt, and you got a mirror image at Charlotte FC.   Problem isn't him admitting he was wrong IMO.....it's him just getting something right to start with. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

You don't give up on the #1 overall pick in the draft after one season, I don't care how bad he played.

He'll get 2024 to show significant improvement under the new regime. If he doesn't then it's back to the draft board in 2025.

You have to realize that this is not the new GMs #1 pick anymore. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

You don't give up on the #1 overall pick in the draft after one season, I don't care how bad he played.

He'll get 2024 to show significant improvement under the new regime. If he doesn't then it's back to the draft board in 2025.

This is as plain as the nose on your face. I'm not sure why anyone doesn't understand this. Bryce is our qb until 2025 at minimum.  

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce will probably get through next year as the starter, but I can see it playing out similarly to Fields if we find ourselves with a top 5 pick in 2025. Don't pick up the 5th year option, and have a ''possible'' trade asset. 

I'm half of the mind to tag and trade Burns ''if'' we can get a quality first plus some, if not you just have to pay him, and Brown and continue to build the front 7 around them as they both need solid compliments around them.

We should be trying to add assets where we can via the cap space we have since our QB is on a rookie deal. I think we forget how big a loss both our starting Guards were because we didn't look this bad versus ATL Week 1, and they even managed to finish 7-10. We need to bring in a proven WR one, trade Thielen as it's clear he wants to move on to get what we can, and we need to add guys with some YAC / separation / vertical ability. 

Higgins / Chark (who is at least a vertical threat) / Mingo / and a quick twitch (Flowers / Dell / Hollywood Brown type) would round out the receiver room nicely. Similar to Tua, we have to acquire real legit receiving options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...