Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interview requests


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, methodtoll said:

On the home stretch... Unless we add a last minute interview.... What's everyone's guess for who gets a second interview???? Obviously Ben Johnson will be one.

Prediction: Ben Johnson will turn down our 2nd interview request to become the HC of the Washington Commanders 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Prediction: Ben Johnson will turn down our 2nd interview request to become the HC of the Washington Commanders 

Unfortunately I can see that happening. Love what Johnson could bring to this inept franchise, but just think he would see a brighter future at WSH; which it tbh, it is.

I fully expect Quinn to get the job and dumbass Tepper to come out and say he was the target all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, methodtoll said:

On the home stretch... Unless we add a last minute interview.... What's everyone's guess for who gets a second interview???? Obviously Ben Johnson will be one.

Unsure how many they'll widdle it down to, but I don't really care to see Brian J, Morris, Monken or Quinn have a 2nd.  I will say, since we have a consultant, I wouldn't be surprised if Morris gets a 2nd as a guy to juxtapose the young ones to.  Tabor..I mean, that was obvi courtesy lol.  I will also say, I'm not riding the Frank Smith train for some reason.  

Can also see Slowik bowing out early if they pull off an upset this weekend, so he may focus on building something special in HOU.  

Otherwise, I'd hope Macdonald, Canales, Callahan (& maybe Evero) would be the lot.

Ben Johnson seems to be a foregone conclusion he's our HC or bust so he doesn't warrant much extra thought at this point haha.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also think the slow down of the GM search has more to do with the HC search. Most reports say we want a HC first. Prioritizing that would make sense if it’s true. Now, the real argument is if that’s the right approach. My personal opinion is no, but I know it’s been done that way in some stops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Unsure how many they'll widdle it down to, but I don't really care to see Brian J, Morris, Monken or Quinn have a 2nd.  I will say, since we have a consultant, I wouldn't be surprised if Morris gets a 2nd as a guy to juxtapose the young ones to.  Tabor..I mean, that was obvi courtesy lol.  I will also say, I'm not riding the Frank Smith train for some reason.  

Can also see Slowik bowing out early if they pull off an upset this weekend, so he may focus on building something special in HOU.  

Otherwise, I'd hope Macdonald, Canales, Callahan (& maybe Evero) would be the lot.

Ben Johnson seems to be a foregone conclusion he's our HC or bust so he doesn't warrant much extra thought at this point haha.

 

 

 

Btw, as I was researching Callahan, I saw a video from the Locked On Titans podcast that Callahan is having a second interview with the Titans... So Callahan to the Titans may be in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Steelo said:

Me either, I thought he was going to turn down interviews.

The interesting thing with Slowik is that his current team did a lot of analysis on the QBs in last years draft. So he should be very familiar with Bryce. Not saying he likes or dislikes Bryce, but he knows more about him that most other coaches.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...