Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Definitely Chose the Wrong QB


Calboyz13
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Cope…haha.  Follower.  Literally nothing to cope about.  Dumb 

You dug yourself in so deep with absurd comments pre draft that your only course is to triple down. It's like a train wreck to watch 😆 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheExperimentIsOver said:

Man, if Tank Dell didn't get injured, the Texans might actually be a contender this year. That's crazy. CJ is a generational talent. There should be no doubt about that. The dude steps up time and time again in big games. I've been waiting for him to poo the bed like a rookie, and he just keeps on ascending. 

There is just no way Reich wanted Bryce over Stroud. No way. This is all Tepper's doing. 

Umm, they are literally 2 games away from a superbowl, I'd say that is a contender. They have just as good of a shot as any.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheExperimentIsOver said:

 

Who gives a poo what he did in college? Can he play in the NFL at an elite level expected of his draft position? He's got until the middle of next season to show us what he has. The clock is ticking. 

LOL…when you draft you have college prospects.  
Full House 90S Tv GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted Stroud but I'm an OSU guy and he just looked like he had a better cannon. Ultimately tho, these threads are too frequent and frankly, are stupid. Revisionist history won't get us any closer to not being the worst team in the league. Time to accept the hand we have dealt ourselves.

 

I'll root for the Texans tho, they are fun to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...