Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Playoffs Divisional Round - Games Thread


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Peyton Manning son is wearing a Lamar Jackson jersey.

 

You love to see it. Basically confirming Lamar will be the SB MVP and Regular season MVP.

 

Things I predicted before the season just saying...

You and your hindsight predictions…lol

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Peyton Manning son is wearing a Lamar Jackson jersey.

 

You love to see it. Basically confirming Lamar will be the SB MVP and Regular season MVP.

 

Things I predicted before the season just saying...

You called it. Just hoping he makes it to the big game. He balled out tonight. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ghostofdelhomme said:

If they didn’t want to pay tyreek 25M, why would they give more to either of them? They  have a ton of free agents to sign so cap space is limited. Patty will need a Brady restructure.

Maybe they realize they have a aging Kelce and below average WR's now?

 

Opinions can change over the years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ghostofdelhomme said:

If they didn’t want to pay tyreek 25M, why would they give more to either of them? They  have a ton of free agents to sign so cap space is limited. Patty will need a Brady restructure.

Yeah, at some point the elite QBs have to realize that squeezing ever dime for themselves leaves the team cash strapped to put a team around them. A big part of the reason why Brady has more rings than Manning is that he always had a more team friendly contract. At some point the money is just dick measuring and keeping score. I'd rather take a little less meaning I can have better OL on front of me and better receivers beside me. You're still going to make way more money than you could ever reasonably spend.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

I dont think he played particularly bad as in missing wide open dudes. His o line got eaten alive on most passing downs and his running backs got 1 yard a carry all but one play xD

Yeah but pretty sure he averaged at least 2.5s per drop back. I'm told that's always enough time to make a play. No matter if your receivers are open or not 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking about Lamar, it wasn't too long ago that some here were talking some poo about Jordan Love.

It should be a lesson about having patience and allowing a QB to develop before making all kinds of definitive statements, but some just continue to do it. It doesn't make Lamar or Love look like the clown, I'll tell you that.

And you talked poo about Purdy too, I might add...

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...