Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vrabel interviewing with carolina Thursday

jamos14

By jamos14,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Knaakedup Experienced

Knaakedup

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

Vrabel easily clears the bar of a good coach for me. Let’s not act like he’s had juggernaut rosters in Tennessee. You can make an argument no coach has done more with less over the past few years.

He's also exactly what we need from a cultural standpoint. He’s taken a ragtag group and won games on the road in the playoffs by playing smash mouth, disciplined football. Sound familiar?

Sure, there might be some truth to that but I only see 8-9, maybe 10 wins at best with him at the helm. Nothing exciting about another coach that was just let go. 

 

I guess what I am getting at is, this just appears like a lean into mediocrity just to get out of being pure poo like we are right now. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FuFuLamePoo Mentor

FuFuLamePoo

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Knaakedup said:

To all the people wanting Morris or Vrabel - WHYYYYYYY do we want retreads? This is mind blowing to me. Let's at least follow the trends of what is working at the moment and bring in a successful OC from somewhere. 

16 of the last 23 Super Bowl winners were coached by a retread. I’d say the evidence shows it works just fine.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ncfan said:

What he say?

A couple days ago he gave his list of what coaches will go where, for us he’s been all over the place for a week or so. But that day he said he thinks it will be Canales based off of morgan and then said keep an eye out for Vrabel as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted (edited)

Decent coach, wrong situation.

Put him on the Chargers and it probably works out, put him on the Panthers and it probably ends the same way as it did for him in Tennessee.

I also want nothing to do with Arthur Smith and it’s likely that he reunites with Vrabel.

Would prefer Canales out of the realistic options, assuming Johnson and Slowik aren’t realistic.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Knaakedup said:

To all the people wanting Morris or Vrabel - WHYYYYYYY do we want retreads? This is mind blowing to me. Let's at least follow the trends of what is working at the moment and bring in a successful OC from somewhere. 

To me, comparing Morris and Vrabel is unfair. Vrabel turned a bad team around and had four consecutive winning seasons, I don’t think Morris did that as a HC (at least that I can remember) 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

16 of the last 23 Super Bowl winners were coached by a retread. I’d say the evidence shows it works just fine.

Though out anything associated with Tom Brady and what is that number? Just do last 10 years when the league dramatically shifted to a pass first and what is that number? I have no idea id honestly be interested in what it looks like 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steelo Proficient

Steelo

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Though out anything associated with Tom Brady and what is that number? Just do last 10 years when the league dramatically shifted to a pass first and what is that number? I have no idea id honestly be interested in what it looks like 

Year No. Winner Opposition Score Venue
2023 LVII Kansas City Chiefs Philadelphia Eagles 38-35 Arizona
2022 LVI Los Angeles Rams Cincinnati Bengals 23-20 Los Angeles
2021 LV Tampa Bay Buccaneers Kansas City Chiefs 31-9 Tampa
2020 LIV Kansas City Chiefs San Francisco 49ers 31-20 Miami
2019 LIII New England Patriots Los Angeles Rams 13-3 Atlanta
2018 LII Philadelphia Eagles New England Patriots 41-33 Minneapolis
2017 LI New England Patriots Atlanta Falcons 34-28 Houston
2016 L Denver Broncos Carolina Panthers 24-10 Santa Clara
2015 XLIX New England Patriots Seattle Seahawks 28-24 Phoenix
2014 XLVIII Seattle Seahawks Denver Broncos 43-8 New Jersey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...