Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Russell Wilson


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, t96 said:

Getting out ahead of it early because you know this will come up eventually. He'll be cut by the Broncos this offseason and Canales coached him directly for 4 years (and was WRs coach before that since before Wilson got drafted), so there are significant ties to him. Dalton is under contract but can easily be cut.

 

Would you consider signing Russ? Yay or nay?

 

Personally not a fan but I could see us considering him because of Canales' ties to him. Would probably come cheap and could actually push Bryce more than Dalton at this point. But I wouldn't really want him in the locker room and his play on the field with the Broncos has been uninspiring to say the least.

Good thought, I have never liked him, but probably for the wrong reasons.  Something to keep an eye on

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Good thought, I have never liked him, but probably for the wrong reasons.  Something to keep an eye on

I have never liked him either. Just dot connecting that would happen eventually and it’s a slow part of the offseason…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I would be shocked if they sign him.  It would basically be admitting Bryce isn’t going to work out.

admitting Bryce isn't going to work out would be a good sign for this franchise's future under Morgan/Canales, IMO

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ANY money spent right now on a player who won't be here more than 3 years is a stupid waste...plain and simple...this is a FULL SCALE rebuild people.  It will take a few years AT LEAST before we are competing for a deep Playoff run....why waste money on guys at the end of there career?  We should be cutting/trading anyone in the 2nd half of their career other than massively cheap backups....period...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I agree. I’m just under the assumption that giving Bryce the old college try this year was part of the terms of employment.

yeah it very well may have been, I hope not but wouldn't surprise me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Waldo said:

If you are going to admit Bryce is what he looks like then find a better option. Wilson looks headed in the sub 3000 yards area permanently while Bryce didn't look like he could break through that. Hell go sign Baker first.

Hell no! I'd rather ride with Andy Dalton this year and start over in 2025 than to see that goober in a Panthers jersey for 1 minute. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...