Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trent Brown at LT?


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

 

This will be his third season under his 4th regime

 

Let's be honest... this is his upcoming 2nd regime.  Those interim stints weren't program/scheme altering. Let's see what happens with a new OL coach/philosophy.  Offensive scheme def played a part in the abysmal OL play though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

 

The whole I want dawgz comment may get some folks juices running, but not mine.

I said after the Morgan-Canales presser that I was impressed with Canales, not Morgan.  That comment scared me, frankly.  I keep referencing a comment I heard a defensive backs coach say to the team when I played in college--(paraphrasing) when we (offense, I was a tight end) were eating their lunch at practice:  "I don't care if you run a 4.4 40 if it takes you a fifth of a second longer to process the play than some guy who runs a 4.6.  I want smart football players."

He later explained the comment to a friend of mine who was a GA coach at the time.  "Rarely are you running 4.4 40s on a football field, but you should always be thinking. Most of the better athletes never really had to compete with anyone when they were younger--success came easy.  The kid who has to use his mind is prepared, and frankly, makes fewer mental mistakes.  Eventually the good athletes rise to a point where they are not more physically gifted, and they have been flat lining for some time.  Meanwhile the kid who studies the game becomes more cunning, and soon he knows what the good athletes are going to do before they do." 

I expected Morgan to take off his shirt barking.  

On the other hand, I used to teach in the high school where Brandon Beane was the QB back in the day.  He and I used to get our cars inspected at the same station on the last day of the month.  It was when he was working under Marty H.  I was not that impressed--nice guy, but I never saw him as a "football mind."  I'd take him back in a minute.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2024 at 7:32 AM, bythenbrs said:

BC to LT, Icky to LG.  ‘The answer is already on the roster’. Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.

i didn't know people were still hooked on this idea BC is a LT. He's not. Thank you for my ted talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Leaky_Faucet said:

I'd keep an eye on on Jonah Williams if he makes it to FA. 

My thought exactly. He wants to prove he's a LT, we also want someone to prove they are a LT. I see this as an absolute win. Think he'll cost 10-12 mil per. If he's an average league LT starter that's worth it, imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...