Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josina Anderson thoughts on the Burns situation


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

I bet one of those is not running by the QB and only grabbing them with 1 arm and missing the sack. I like Burns but he has so many miss sacks. 

Playing run defense, giving full effort......could be a number of things

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other NFL players can probably assess Burn's work on the field as much or better than you or I?

They probably are looking at the money and going, man, you aren't earning that money. And they also realize that one bad contract like that means less money available for more players on a team. 

Burns at $27 million could be $1 million more for 27 team members... just saying.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

Other NFL players can probably assess Burn's work on the field as much or better than you or I?

They probably are looking at the money and going, man, you aren't earning that money. And they also realize that one bad contract like that means less money available for more players on a team. 

Burns at $27 million could be $1 million more for 27 team members... just saying.

 

Yeah there is a door that swings two ways here. The players know if a guy is worth the money or not and note who the sap organizations are. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2024 at 8:22 PM, Jon Snow said:

It's about time they stop rewarding mediocre players for mediocre effort.  Screw the moral in the building. Those guys have been one of the worst, and now the worst team the in the league. Its not all on the coaches as to why they suck. If they don't like it it gtfo. We've had too much of that attitude in the building for too long.

Agree with this 100%. Set the tone as an organization, let the chips fall where they may.

Morgans wants dogs..if the puppies start whining show them the door.

All this empower the players ish got us a bunch of whiney entitled softserve drama queens. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Turtle said:

Agree with this 100%. Set the tone as an organization, let the chips fall where they may.

Morgans wants dogs..if the puppies start whining show them the door.

All this empower the players ish got us a bunch of whiney entitled softserve drama queens. 

You know what though? Do you remember Canales’ gushing over those precious fragile things? Basically promising to pamper them.

You can’t really listen to them because they say diametrically opposed poo if it suits them in that moment.  

I mean, by what they say we are gonna get dawgs, if French Poodles are dawgs. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting topic.  I have had a few NFL friends and one told me that he could not work out or train unless the activities and facilities were approved. AI: In many NFL contracts, certain activities are restricted, and injuries sustained during those activities can lead to the voiding of contract guarantees or even the entire contract. These restrictions often include dangerous activities like skydiving, rock climbing, or even engaging in contact sports like boxing. Additionally, injuries sustained while working out at non-team facilities or during personal recreational activities may be classified as "non-football injuries," potentially impacting the player's compensation.    Having said that, I question the reason the person filming this was not helping.  Secondly, the decision to put it on social media makes it seem a bit prearranged.  I do not think this would violate his contract, but I do think it is a bit stupid on his part in that he could be injured.    
    • Doesn't make it right.  And as you put it, you wanted to ban him from being country, which is essentially policing who he is as a person lol  I get protecting the "asset", but banning people from living their life is crazy. Russell Wilson likes to play helicopter pilot.  I would deem that WAY more dangerous.  Those things scare me.  I still wouldn't want to keep him from doing it if I were his boss.  I would just try not to think about it, haha.
    • Could do better could do worse. I've seen some people very indignant over bringing him back and I can absolutely relate to the sentiment. But it's just in a backup role. He's also a good locker room presence and an effort player so for a 1 year rental in a year where we aren't going to do much it's fine. This is a development year. And there will be options if need be at the trade deadline. Besides at the end of the day we all knew a signing like this was around the corner after how drafting Mark Williams ended. He should have been our franchise center for the next several years. I don’t put that failure on the Hornets.
×
×
  • Create New...