Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Division Talk: Falcons are heavy favorites to land Justin Fields


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Betting lines everywhere on everything these days... jeebus. 

They gamble on WWE, a fixed outcome and there was a line on whether or not the Titantic submersible would be found in time to save the occupants. There is no bottom and frankly I just hope all of these people go broke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chicago isn't getting a 1st for Fields... If people aren't busting down the door to trade for him now, the closer they get to their self-imposed deadline the less likely they are to get a 1st. I say they get a 2nd/3rd and a mixed bag of picks in the later rounds. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks said:

I was thinking maybe a 2025 first and a second this year. Something like that

juan posted some of latest talk. I think pft also posted that it will take either a 2 or 3 this year and a future pick tied to if he signs a deal with the same team. Sorta like the riley deal in jax. I think that way too.

Just what sorta price do you sign fields at?? 40 million per, thats a hard one as well. 

@Varking get in here and defend your boy!

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Steelo said:

Chicago isn't getting a 1st for Fields... If people aren't busting down the door to trade for him now, the closer they get to their self-imposed deadline the less likely they are to get a 1st. I say they get a 2nd/3rd and a mixed bag of picks in the later rounds. 

They got a first + Dj Moore for Byrce Young. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Steelo said:

Chicago isn't getting a 1st for Fields... If people aren't busting down the door to trade for him now, the closer they get to their self-imposed deadline the less likely they are to get a 1st. I say they get a 2nd/3rd and a mixed bag of picks in the later rounds. 

Maybe the bigger issue is, you have to extend fields too. Thats one 40 million per type issue. 40per @ 5years, so 200 million ....man thats rough to do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Maybe the bigger issue is, you have to extend fields too. Thats one 40 million per type issue. 40per @ 5years, so 200 million ....man thats rough to do

Damn, I actually forgot about that too... they might get even less if another team just calls their bluff and waits them out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Steelo said:

Damn, I actually forgot about that too... they might get even less if another team just calls their bluff and waits them out. 

Yea, I got no clue how this plays out. Again I was no fan of his, but he played better each month. Hes still young and the going rate for average starter QB pay is around 40 million. Thats super hard to commit that coin to fields. 

The reports were many teams were calling about him, lies......if you look into who can write that 200 million or find some team that thinks hes worth it forget about the picks..

One of the deals were this move will cause a 9.0 earthquake in the NFL. 

With ATL, you can hand the ball to two stud RBs 40 times and look great doing so. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, KSpan said:

That would be a coup, and Chicago with 3 1st rounders in the top 10, one of which would obviously be a QB... what a golden situation. 

I don't see Atl giving up a 1st for Fields.  I think a team ends up getting a good deal on him in terms of a trade.... considering everyone will know Chicago has to get rid of him and then you have to pay him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...