Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan is a legend and I trust him


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

Morgan wanted to keep Burns and not deal him to the Rams for multiple first round picks.  Guys like Dan Morgan are why we are where we are today. 

Morgan was part of a group led by a bad GM (that we didn't  realize was so bad at the time) that thought it was a good idea at the time based on what they thought we were capable of.

You ever have those moments where something seems like a good idea at the time and then, after you step in it, you realize that it was a dog poo decision? That's how you learn. You step in poo and decide that is something you don't want to do again.

But after you step in dog poo and realize you should do what it takes to avoid it, you still have to deal with the poo already on your shoe. That might mean getting up close and personal with it and scraping it off. It stinks, and it's nasty and it's something  you really feel disgusted doing, but you do it anyways because it has to be done.

That's what we did yesterday, not that burns is dog poo. The situation was. It sucked that we had to do it because we stepped in it, but it had to be done and now we hope we've learned a we move forward.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jamos14 said:

I do think Morgan wanted to keep Burns at the time. Person reported that.  

 

But it was vastly different circumstances; we were still holding on to hope that we were a good team and didn't need a complete tear down.

They felt 27 million a year was going to get it done.  They, meaning the ones that actually do the contracts.  That's not Morgan, and it wasn't Fitt. 

Edited by pantherclaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherclaw said:

The trade to the Giants proves this wrong. 

I mean, you could essentially do those gymnastics with Fitterer, Tepper, etc too. 

Reporting from the longest-tenured beat writer said who did and didn't want to trade Burns to the Rams.   Fitterer and Morgan didn't have a realistic plan once they decided to keep Burns and not deal him to the Rams.  And that blew up on them.  They wanted to keep him and not pay him insane money.   Which didn't work.  And was really foolish once Burns had the leverage of what the Rams offered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I mean, you could essentially do those gymnastics with Fitterer, Tepper, etc too. 

Reporting from the longest-tenured beat writer said who did and didn't want to trade Burns to the Rams.   Fitterer and Morgan didn't have a realistic plan once they decided to keep Burns and not deal him to the Rams.  And that blew up on them.  They wanted to keep him and not pay him insane money.   Which didn't work.  And was really foolish once Burns had the leverage of what the Rams offered. 

samir wanted to do the trade

 

and then got fired

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I mean, you could essentially do those gymnastics with Fitterer, Tepper, etc too. 

Reporting from the longest-tenured beat writer said who did and didn't want to trade Burns to the Rams.   Fitterer and Morgan didn't have a realistic plan once they decided to keep Burns and not deal him to the Rams.  And that blew up on them.  They wanted to keep him and not pay him insane money.   Which didn't work.  And was really foolish once Burns had the leverage of what the Rams offered. 

27 million a year wasn't going to get it done.  Didn't matter where he was at. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CRA said:

Morgan wanted to keep Burns and not deal him to the Rams for multiple first round picks.  Guys like Dan Morgan are why we are where we are today. 

You have a source of this or just talking out of your a$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

none of that matters, they didnt want to do the trade regardless of whatever salary they were offering or what he wanted

 

You are right.  They didn't.    It was clearly foolish in hindsight.   The team thought they were in a better position long term than they were.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...