Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clowney coming home?


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 3/20/2024 at 8:48 PM, rayzor said:

We don't need stars. The more stars you have, the more money they get. The more money they get, the less you have to spread around. The less you have to spread around, the more top heavy you get. The more top heavy you are, the more likely you are to fall on your face.

Build a strong foundation made up of solid players, not stars, but solid players who want to fight glory rather than the big pay day.

Good teams are built in the shoulders of a foundation of "average Joe's" who have that fight in them.

I agree on this everywhere but QB and WR/TE

 

on defense unless you got a HOF player i'd rather have a bunch of hungry dudes capable of getting after it than 2-3 fed dudes surrounded by a bunch of scrubs cause thats all we could afford. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

You and your desire to have "stars" on the team. You care more about name and status than anything else.

It's 2024 if you think we are winning games with no names then good luck.

 

You need elite players to win games my man. That Jersey shore water got you thinking cray cray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Newsflash we don't like stars. We develop and trade them all away CMC/Moore/Burns.

 

Brown is the last star we have on the entire roster.

Out of that list, honestly, only CMC has proven to still be a star. The other guys looked like stars on our team, but to the outside observer, meh.

Brown, I think, has star power. I really want to see him with a good team built around him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...