Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unnecessary Bluntness: Do Panthers already have a draft crush?


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, he is raw and is currently developing at a pretty significant rate.   So to me, he just doesn't compare to a Mingo.   They just were on two different protectories in college and coming into the draft. 

I mean, I want Mitchell, Ladd, the Texans boys, etc. at 33rd.  My Leggette talk is about getting him on a double dip in the 3rd.  If someone wants to draft him before that, so be it.   There is always a team, sometimes us, that over drafts someone out of need.  I just think WRs could fall in this one given how many good prospects their are. 

Im fine with taking him in the third.  This was mostly all in response to the people wanting him at 33 or saying he may not make it out of the first.  Mitchell or Chop Robinson are my #1 hopes for pick 33.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

This right here. Exactly why you cant just compare him to Mingo off measurables.

Im not, I'm comparing them off of their poor route running and lack of seperation and lateral quickness.  Its just a coincidence their measurables are really similar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Im fine with taking him in the third.  This was mostly all in response to the people wanting him at 33 or saying he may not make it out of the first.  Mitchell or Chop Robinson are my #1 hopes for pick 33.

yeah, I don't want him at 33.  That's not good value.  I'm like you, Mitchell is my ideal get there. There are better WRs at 33.  Now, if you can get him in the 3rd round? That's a great value.   And I wouldn't be upset with 2 WRs in this class. 

I mean, they could draft Leggette and I love it....or they could draft him and I hate him.  Depends where you draft him.  Really anyone.  

I hated where they drafted Mingo and especially Johnson last year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Leggette, I go back to Brugler and a few others saying his stock quietly took a pretty big hit at Senior Bowl practices.

I’m not one to just roll with the trendy guy or what analysts are saying, but we need route running and a technician who can make an immediate impact along with that nice plus starter/all-pro upside. Play outside, inside. X, Z, slot. That is not Legette. He just gives me way too much pause at 33 or even 39. Mitchell, McConkey, Pearsall fit what I gravitate towards but we’ll see.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Im not, I'm comparing them off of their poor route running and lack of seperation and lateral quickness.  Its just a coincidence their measurables are really similar. 

Legette plays physical and has speed, but he is not a savvy route runner who easily shakes man coverage — and that was at a college level. So move it to NFL and that all gets amplified. He does not fit what we need IMO.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Legette plays physical and has speed, but he is not a savvy route runner who easily shakes man coverage — and that was at a college level. So move it to NFL and that all gets amplified. He does not fit what we need IMO.

technically, every skill position on O is a need for us though.   Theilen and most likely Diontae....don't have the greatest odds of being around past this year. 

Bryce/Mingo are really the only guys that project out....and both of them were VERY disappointing as rookies.  Cupboard is pretty bare here.  I think we just need to add as much talent as possible.  BPA on O all draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Watching Legette’s film, I’m pretty underwhelmed at #33.  

3rd round, for sure.

but has a single poster even argued for Legette at 33?  Lots are arguing against taking him at 33. 

I mean, I guess there is the worry the Panthers could do Panther things and overdraft him though.  So I guess there is that.  Consensus here is that 33 is too high I would think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, top dawg said:

There are even more questions regarding Coleman's ability to be an X considering his lack of speed. I'm not going to post his strengths and weaknesses here (from the 33rd team which I find are critical, but probably fair), but he has more questions as to whether his traits will translate to the pros.

https://www.the33rdteam.com/keon-coleman-nfl-draft-2024-combine-results-scouting-report-for-florida-state-wr/

Looks like their rating and weaknesses are pretty similar on nfl.com. 

 

The mosy alarming for this offense. 

  • Below-average quickness getting in and out of his breaks.

You've convinced me on Coleman.....now I don't either of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think you can afford to have a crush when there's gonna be 32 guys go ahead of you. Wel could package #33 and #39 to move up but I'd prefer we didn't. We need bodies, not just one guy. I'd rather have two top 40 guys than one top 15ish guy given our situation. 33+39 = roughly #14.

If a top ten guy drops to 15 range then it has to be a consideration

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

If a top ten guy drops to 15 range then it has to be a consideration

I think we have enough of a talent deficit I'd still rather have two top 40 at bats. Lord knows Panthers fans should understand by now that there's no such thing as a sure thing when it comes to draft picks. Trading 33 and 39 for a potential disappointment in the mid-teens is a dick punch this team can I'll afford to risk.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think we have enough of a talent deficit I'd still rather have two top 40 at bats. Lord knows Panthers fans should understand by now that there's no such thing as a sure thing when it comes to draft picks. Trading 33 and 39 for a potential disappointment in the mid-teens is a dick punch this team can I'll afford to risk.

Based on recent drafts, a dick-punch for #33 would be doable.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

technically, every skill position on O is a need for us though.   Theilen and most likely Diontae....don't have the greatest odds of being around past this year. 

Bryce/Mingo are really the only guys that project out....and both of them were VERY disappointing as rookies.  Cupboard is pretty bare here.  I think we just need to add as much talent as possible.  BPA on O all draft. 

Yeah I agree that we could use any type of receiver, but we have to prioritize the one's that don't need acclimation in respect to NFL-discipline, refined route running, and being a natural separator.  Those are the missing traits that have giant alarm bells blaring in this WR room that we didn't go for when drafting TMJ and Mingo.  

We've been picking ones that have the upside, good size, big time testers, but needed legit acclimation in respect to route running and/or in-game discipline.  We need the technicians and students of the game.   In my view, we absolutely need to favor that over the receivers that have the X potential, but don't necessarily have the high floor.    

I feel like McConkey & Pearsall have flashing green lights for whoever drafts them.  Both are instant top-15 route runners in the NFL once drafted, are lightning quick, playmakers, with measurables to boot.  

If we're talking 3rd-4th round, I could be down with Legette but this is a situation where he's not coming into start outside for us of the bat.  If we want instant impact, it's these Z/Slot switcher types.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...