Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Xavier Legette and Peyton Wilson 33 and 39


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mol3m4n said:

1. He played at USC, so you just affirmed you know nothing about the guy and still have an opinion. 

2. I'm a UNC fan. 

Leggette played at USC. 

CRA is a Clempsun fan

Hence him devaluing Leggette

Anything else you need explained?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, csx said:

Clempsun fan

I mean, I’ve been lobbying for Leggette for weeks and weeks.  And it started before the combine….but now I’m some Clemson hater?  

my ideal draft I was pitching was a back to back of some sort of Mitchell and then Leggette back to back play and that was before we picked up that 2nd. 

and the top of the 3rd was a possibility then.  Now people are driving him up their boards higher.  Which happens. 

so yeah, I’d love Leggette.  At the right place. Which isn’t the 33rd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, csx said:

Leggette played at USC. 

CRA is a Clempsun fan

Hence him devaluing Leggette

Anything else you need explained?

I’ve been a Leggette praiser bruh.  Tons of threads where I’m arguing for him.  I mean, he has been part of almost every mock scenario I have pitched since pre-combine.
 
I just don’t want him at 33.   Say that one thing and you erase all my Leggette stan posting lol.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SOJA said:

Wilson is a huge medical red flag. I'd rather us target BPA out of WR, OT, OG, C, DE, CB at 33 and 39 anyway. positional value matters 

Nearly all teams pass on Cs if you are talking value. I mean name one C drafted in the top ten that you can remember?(I got nothing and I was a former draft nut) Plus remember Kalil fell to the Panthers and forced them to draft him even with hartwig was here with a big contract. 

For me C is just like TE and DT(well it use to be), its soooo undervalued. To me center makes the OL go, but come draft day and pay day, teams disagree. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PFF's Monson thinks Legette is a good option for the Panthers.

 

"Teams often look to trade back up to the first picks of the second round after they get a chance to gauge the players who fell. Last year, Tennesse jumped into Pick 33 to select quarterback Will Levis, and the true best-case scenario for Carolina is that a trade partner gives them a reason to move back. Last year, Arizona moved back eight spots and picked up an extra third-round selection to do so.

"If Carolina got the same deal, they could still grab their favorite receiver, only with an extra draft pick along the way. South Carolina’s Xavier Legette would add size and speed to this group, as well as a contested-catch skill set not currently on the roster."

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2024/04/06/nfl-draft-2024-panthers-pff-xavier-legette/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/6/2024 at 6:38 PM, top dawg said:

PFF's Monson thinks Legette is a good option for the Panthers.

 

"Teams often look to trade back up to the first picks of the second round after they get a chance to gauge the players who fell. Last year, Tennesse jumped into Pick 33 to select quarterback Will Levis, and the true best-case scenario for Carolina is that a trade partner gives them a reason to move back. Last year, Arizona moved back eight spots and picked up an extra third-round selection to do so.

"If Carolina got the same deal, they could still grab their favorite receiver, only with an extra draft pick along the way. South Carolina’s Xavier Legette would add size and speed to this group, as well as a contested-catch skill set not currently on the roster."

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2024/04/06/nfl-draft-2024-panthers-pff-xavier-legette/

 

Exactly what I'm thinking they will do. If Legette is taken, they will draft Corley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Billy Goat said:

Joe Person has us taking Legette at 39 in his 2.0 mock. He had us trading away 33 to the Jags for 48, 153 and a 2025 second rounder. Another terrible trade to go with the one he had in his first mock.

I just have 2 wishes for this draft.  Don't trade down.  And get a WR in the 2nd.   Just get BPA at WR.  Last thing we need to do is water down picks when we don't have a 1st to begin with. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

So we want Leggett who is a Mingo clone over McConkey whose production is in amongst Waddle, Olave, M. Brown, Smith-Njiba and Nacua?

Seems a very Panthery move.

Leggette is not a Mingo clone.  That's just calling a dude who is short Steve Smith.   They had different trajectories and peaks in college.  They weren't playing the same game in college at their college peaks. 

I don't want him over Ladd.  But he isn't Mingo coming out.  If Mingo was in this draft, he is behind Leggette. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

So we want Leggett who is a Mingo clone over McConkey whose production is in amongst Waddle, Olave, M. Brown, Smith-Njiba and Nacua?

Seems a very Panthery move.

Where'd you get we want one over another? Both are confirmed to have visited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Leggette is not a Mingo clone.  That's just calling a dude who is short Steve Smith.   They had different trajectories and peaks in college.  They weren't playing the same game in college at their college peaks. 

I don't want him over Ladd.  But he isn't Mingo coming out. 

He's raw like Mingo. Point being another physical specimen that needs a lot of refinement isn't what we need.  Again, we already have one of those.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, csx said:

Where'd you get we want one over another? Both are confirmed to have visited. 

We brought him in, so there's interest.  I can think of several WRs I'd take before Legette.  Doubtful he's the best WR on the board at #33--or even #39 for that matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...