Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Offense and its Impact on Bryce Young and the WR(s) we draft


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Stingray3030 said:

Worst OLine in the league paired with worst WR core in the league paired with below average TE receiving group paired with below average RB receivers paired with an outdated scheme paired with horrendous team culture.  Our offense as a whole was probably worse than the top 25 in the NCAA last year....not exaggerating.  It isn't excuses it is facts....data, results, eye test all confirm.

Bryce could very well be the problem - but you would never know based on last season because he had offensively the worst situation I have ever heard of any quarterback walking into.  Seriously look at the last 5-10 years of top 10 picked QB's and find me an equivalent....I would bet it is next to impossible.

That said we have improved our OLine tremendously on paper, improved our WR room by 1 significant piece, hopefully improved our scheme and culture tremendously - TE, RB, and WR still need major work to even be average weapons in the passing game.  If we hit well on a WR and TE we will know for sure who Bryce is gonna be and what his potential is.  Is he Tua or is he prime Russ?  No matter what we have to hit consistently in drafts going forward - in all aspects - that is what has held this team down for a decade or more.

I like this guy. 

Great Job Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MHS831 said:

 

Really enjoyed reading your thoughts on this.  Agree with pretty much all of it. 

I know it's not cool to still support Bryce,  although my thoughts of him haven't changed in the last year.  This kid is a talented leader.   It would be nice to see an offense that doesn't get him killed, allowing him to not just work, but play to his strengths.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A strong running game equates to a balanced attack.  Balanced attacks tend to strike more often then others. 

Despite the league being a pass happy league, a well executed run play is still the most difficult offense play to defend. 

We need that balance.  We need a strong running game. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

A strong running game equates to a balanced attack.  Balanced attacks tend to strike more often then others. 

Despite the league being a pass happy league, a well executed run play is still the most difficult offense play to defend. 

We need that balance.  We need a strong running game. 

 

We need another JStew.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I can say that the point here was, at least in part, to gauge the type of WR we may pursue.  None of us can change the QB situation and it is doubtful the Panthers will in 2024.  I can say that when Bryce planted his foot and stepped into the throw, he was money. That rarely happened.

Lad McConkey and Ricky Pearsall are perfect for what Canales wants to do. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

He's still my favorite Panther RB.  He is.my style of running back.  

Which doesn't necessarily fit today's spread offenses. 

if you could of turned injuries off like in Madden and had him be the featured RB? Stewart likely would be a legit Panther GOAT.  Crazy skill set. 

Despite being built like he could of played in the 80s.....Stewart was also great in a spread offense and modern looks.  Oregon was straight spread and his best season as a Panther was running out of the Cam gun. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

News Flash, just get DK Metcalf!

This just popped up in my YouTube feed, and I was like WTF?  Bryce's team won the flag football tournament so there's that.  I'm sure many of y'all are going to make the statement "a good place for him" etc.  

But what sticks out to me in the very few parts with Young is if he can find a guy to make a play, he'll find them.  No, this was not NFL football, it was a charity flag football game.  Bryce needs guys who will make plays.  Like most NFL QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...