Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seeking Insights on RB and TE


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello pals and close impersonal friends,

As we progress towards the draft, it seems to me that this off-season and the draft will be dedicated to providing Bryce with all the weapons he needs to be successful.   We all jumped to OL and WR, and rightly so.  However, do we have that game-changing RB and a TE threat that are good enough to qualify as "weapons?"  If we are truly going to give Bryce the weaponry he needs, can we say that we have done that with our current roster in the area of TE and RB?

When I mock, I am focused on CB, WR, LB--and many mocks I do not have a RB or TE. 

TE:  Last year, Dalton Kincaid, Sam LaPorta, and Luke Musgrave were successful in year 1.  A few others, such as Mayer, Washington, and Schoonmaker disappointed as rookies, but for the most part, first year TEs were successful.   In my view, there is one sure thing at TE in this draft and there is another who should be on the level of Kincaid and LaPorta--TE Sanders from Texas.   If we want to upgrade at TE, we need him, in my view.  Or we should probably start Tremble and hope that his improvement continues.

  • Q: Is there a TE in this draft that will make us better?  Should we continue to bring along Tremble? 

RB:  Chubba Hubbard had 900 yards last season, but he averaged a meager 3.8 yards.  Of course, with the new OL, that should improve. Sanders shows us what running behind an outstanding OL can do for your career.  He averaged 3.3 yards per carry and fumbled about once every 65 carries (2 fumbles, 129 carries).  However, before coming to Carolina, Sanders averaged 4.8 yards per carry.   His numbers should improve with the new OL. 

  • Do we need a feature RB?  Do we need a bowling ball or a Swiss Army knife?  Can we assume that our RB production will improve with our $150m guards? 

OVERARCHING QUESTION:  Is it reasonable to assume that the best "bang for the buck" (players likely to see extensive, meaningful playing time as starters or key rotational players) is to focus on TE, RB, and one more WR?   

UNDERARCHING RHETORICAL QUESTION:  Has MHS lost his mind? 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have much respect for Chubba.  He is a hard-nosed, down hill runner that isn't terrible in the passing game.  I don't feel he is a feature back. 

Most elite offenses don't have a bell cow feature back.  So we should draft another RB anyways. Not sure where the value will line up with the pick.  It will also be interesting to see what kind of RB that D&D target. 

I'm also always for adding a talented TE.  It would be nice to see Tremble blossom to be a consistent threat in the passing game.  He doesn't have to have 1000 yard seasons. Just be consistent, and get first downs and TDs. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

We don't need someone to carry the load at RB.  But, we could use one that is strong as a receiver to pair with Chuba.  If there is someone like that late in the draft, I would think about taking them.

Take a look at the RB from KY ray Davis.  Small and bowling ball ish  and can catch.   could be there in 4th.  Great story--was homeless, etc.  https://www.nfl.com/prospects/ray-davis/32004441-5663-2804-a8ce-2174ee79562e

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn’t put Sanders close to Kincaid or La Porta. I don’t think he’s worth a 2nd. It would be a big kick in the nuts if we go TE this year instead of last year. TE should have been last year instead of Mingo. This is why we’ve sucked so bad lately. We overdraft at positions that aren’t deep instead of targeting guys who fall because it’s a deep class. Kincaid and La Porta had great seasons for rookies. TEs don’t typically have great production as rookies, even the great ones.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Canales, he gave Rachaad White almost 300 carries and nearly 60 targets receiving.  And factor in our new prized possession in Hunt- he led the top-running OL in Miami that was paving lanes for Achane/Mostert to amass almost 2,000 rushing yards in a wide zone scheme.  Note they had McDaniel and the speed at WR and RB to help stretch the field in multiple different ways.   

We just don't have the guy to fit the bill. Chuba and Miles aren't forcing any defense to adjust.  

Getting a feature back that can hit home runs is super critical to any success we'll have.  I would not be surprised if one of 5 (Brooks, Corum, Benson, Wright or Lloyd) ends up on this team as our new main guy whose name you'll hear quite a lot moving forward.  

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Canales ran this man into the dirt.  Nearly 300 carries at 3.6 average lmao.

Yeah.  They didn't have much else there--White isn't that good a runner and Edmunds was the backup who's pretty bad.  And had a bit lackluster OL in respect to a ground game.  Yet he was still strongly dedicated to the ground game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The moment we drafted Bryce....slot WR, TE, and rec RB IMO were the 3 key positions for him to succeed.   And we have failed him in those 3 spots.   Bryce is suppose to be a PG dink and dunker IMO.  So you need YAC guys at those spots. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

I’d rather take the chance that Sanders rebounds rather than take a RB in the draft (unless it’s like 5th round). 

if Sanders rebounds.....he still is one of the worst receiving RBs in the NFL.  Because that what he was in 2 of the last 3 seasons in Philly and ultimately why they parted with him.   We aren't meshing talented with our QB.  Bryce needs diverse RBs that can catch and make plays.  

We need what Cohen was in Chicago pre injury.   

We need to draft RB talent.  Rounds 3 or 4 is where you build your backfield IMO.  We should always be adding talent.  We should quit with FA RBs. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok--I have seen some sample items, and I would like to see something (if possible) measures on field intelligence--maybe how quickly you can grasp a playbook or absorb film session adjustments...Back when we had Morrison as team president and Hurney as GM, I offered to assess (as part of my research in education requirement at a University) emotional intelligence and learning styles of players to help coaches teach more effectively.  Morrison loved it and contacted me about it.  Hurney was not interested, and it fell through the cracks.  My pitch?  If only 50% of first-rounders become successful NFL players and that number drops significantly, can you tell me that you are effectively measuring talent?  Morrison thought it was a good point and wanted to do something that might improve long-term success rates--that would impact the cap management, etc.  Marty, according to Morrison, said he was not interested at this time and if so, he would want a football guy to do it.  (I told Morrison that I played in college and Hurney, a sports reporter at one time, did not. (He told me that Hurney played as a Guard in college--who knew?) Any way, about that time, Morrison left (2017) and the idea was dropped.  I reached back out a year later or so to Marty was still not interested.  A few days later, his wife accused him of assault or something, so I dropped it.
    • Pretty sure they still do the Wonderlic they just don't publicly release the scores.
    • I just thought he was under the radar--but thanks for opening our eyes to him.  I think we should have better measures for intelligence--such as reaction time, angles, etc. Legette is raw as heck, for example, and his RAS was very high.  We used to do the Wonderlic (which was not great) but to know how effectively a player makes on field decisions would be great.  
×
×
  • Create New...