Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Inactives: Starters get the night off against Jets


Carolina Panthers
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

This is the by product of only a 3 game preseason, and the importance to figure out the entire roster. Not the starters. 

It's just more important to get the depth figured out.  The 1 or 2 series the starters would get isn't going to change anything.  Except to the fans. 

Weird how basically only Carolina, the worst team in the NFL, views it what way 

  • Flames 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

This is the by product of only a 3 game preseason, and the importance to figure out the entire roster. Not the starters. 

It's just more important to get the depth figured out.  The 1 or 2 series the starters would get isn't going to change anything.  Except to the fans. 

This is just flat out wrong

NFL game speed is different than training camp, even the practices against other teams.

Getting the starters a series or two in each preseason game will help them be more up to speed and in sync from the opening kickoff would be a massive help.

It's not as important for 30 year old vets, but we have a young team, particularly on the offensive side of the ball.  The game speed reps for them are far more important to this season than to figure out who are going to be the 45-53 men on the roster.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Weird how basically only Carolina, the worst team in the NFL, views it what way 

Exactly

If KC is playing Mahomes and Kelce in the preseason, then we have ZERO argument to make for not playing Bryce and his young teammates.

If teams don't want to play their 35 year old QB's, then yea, that I understand, or someone coming off a serious injury last year, okay.

But that's not our situation, these guys need game speed reps, it's going to be a rough enough season as is, why are they not trying to do more right now?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, bigjohn said:

Not saying I necessarily agree with the approach, but I do understand some of the reasoning.

-We are so thin at some positions, a couple of injuries could make a huge difference. We have such a depth issue, we'd be picking up other teams cuts to start for us.

-With the 17 game season, you can almost make the argument that importance of the first few games is much less than normal.

-Coach may be thinking "We probably aren't making the playoffs anyway, but either way it's more important for us to play better the second half of the season, and we stand a better chance of that if we avoid extra live bullets in the preseason".

-Gives a much chance to see if any of the backups can play at all.

Just some of the thoughts. Those joint practices are better for evaluating talent in some ways anyway.

 

If it were me, I'd definitely play the starters a series or so in this game.  But I also think some of us are so starved to see these guys, we want that for ourselves.

 

If we open up the first game with a 14-3 lead at half, I wonder what the reaction would be (besides most of us being drunk off our ass in disbelief)?

Honestly, it's probably as much about delaying the inevitable embarrassment for as long as possible as it is about any actual strategic approach. As long as we're playing scrubs we can act like it'll be so much better once we're playing our starters and game planning. You know, kinda like we were doing this time last year.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

This is just flat out wrong

NFL game speed is different than training camp, even the practices against other teams.

Getting the starters a series or two in each preseason game will help them be more up to speed and in sync from the opening kickoff would be a massive help.

It's not as important for 30 year old vets, but we have a young team, particularly on the offensive side of the ball.  The game speed reps for them are far more important to this season than to figure out who are going to be the 45-53 men on the roster.

I'm happy you have an opinion of your own. It doesn't make that I posted wrong. I didn't post.my opinion.  I posted what is happening. 

We don't have to agree with it. 

I, at least, understand it. 

Edited by pantherclaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pantherclaw said:

Frankly, the fact that the starting oline has gotten so little time together upsets me more than anything.  

 

Unfortunately this is the modern NFL.  

I haven't liked the NFL ever since the CBA. 

Damn sissy league now. 

Oh yeah, and bring back the grass you fuging idiots! Keep the non football players off it. 

OFF MY GRASS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...