Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oline depth and the waiver wire


dxpanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

We're gonna cut some quality db's this year. I'm wondering if there are teams out there with a similar issue at the OL positions. We'll have our pick of anyone that comes across the waiver wire. What are some teams with depth or names that might be getting cut? 

 

I know Dallas has a history with producing quality pieces across the line, but know nothing about anyone else.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, quality backup olinemen are so rare to come by nowadays, that teams arent just going to be cutting guys that can come in and fix our oline depth issues.

That's why its so important to target guys in the later rounds of the draft which we have failed to do in the past years. Id rather take a flyer on a G/T from a big ten school, than a CB or S that might play gunner on special teams or be a backup nickel.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Lemory said:

Unfortunately, quality backup olinemen are so rare to come by nowadays, that teams arent just going to be cutting guys that can come in and fix our oline depth issues.

That's why it’s so important to target guys in the later rounds of the draft which we have failed to do in the past years. Id rather take a flyer on a G/T from a big ten school, than a CB or S that might play gunner on special teams or be a backup nickel.

I only have hope that some other teams are overloaded in a spot and it becomes a numbers game where u get a guy that’s decent.  That’s when the #1 on waiver wire will buy u some traction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Lemory said:

Unfortunately, quality backup olinemen are so rare to come by nowadays, that teams arent just going to be cutting guys that can come in and fix our oline depth issues.

That's why its so important to target guys in the later rounds of the draft which we have failed to do in the past years. Id rather take a flyer on a G/T from a big ten school, than a CB or S that might play gunner on special teams or be a backup nickel.

^This, but that makes too much sense for the Panthers. I routinely mock 1-2 O-linemen every year just because of our historic lack of quality and depth there, especially post Rivera era.  I wanted a center this year, as did a lot of Huddlers who use the mock thread.  We ended up taking a DT and ANOTHER ILB with the last two picks instead.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

With Jameis Winston locking down the QB2 spot in Cleveland the Browns are going to cut one of either Tyler Huntley or DTR. I'd like to bring one of them in to be our QB3 and get Plummer off this team. 

This would be the way.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

^This, but that makes too much sense for the Panthers. I routinely mock 1-2 O-linemen every year just because of our historic lack of quality and depth there, especially post Rivera era.  I wanted a center this year, as did a lot of Huddlers who use the mock thread.  We ended up taking a DT and ANOTHER ILB with the last two picks instead.

Other than one really bad pass blocking rep against the patriots andrew raym has actually looked like a good depth center. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CmC2k said:

With Jameis Winston locking down the QB2 spot in Cleveland the Browns are going to cut one of either Tyler Huntley or DTR. I'd like to bring one of them in to be our QB3 and get Plummer off this team. 

Yea I would love to grab one of those guys or even snag Joe Milton from the pats practice squad if they try to send him down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lemory said:

Unfortunately, quality backup olinemen are so rare to come by nowadays, that teams arent just going to be cutting guys that can come in and fix our oline depth issues.

That's why its so important to target guys in the later rounds of the draft which we have failed to do in the past years. Id rather take a flyer on a G/T from a big ten school, than a CB or S that might play gunner on special teams or be a backup nickel.

I don't know about fixing the problem but I do think we can drastically improve it with priority on the wire.

I'd really like tepper to throw a ton of money at a scout that has a proven track record of finding good OL. whomever we have in the past has been awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Imagine how ugly it’s going to get when we start losing starters for significant chunks of playing time. 

I think that is pretty much understood by everyone now. Even Tepper should know by now that this time is not deep enough. If anything, preseason has made that painfully obvious. Now that it's well known maybe now they will make a concerted effect to change that going forward. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can't keep pining for what never happened....but for god sakes, DeJean, Frazier... and we got this dude in a R1 trade up.  The most notable blunder of this era, that's for sure. 
    • Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
×
×
  • Create New...