Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know it’s preseason but…


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

No idea if it’s been mentioned by anyone, but I’ll be interested to see how the offense looks against not only 1st team defenders but post-first-10-scripted-plays.  How will Canales perform when adjustments are necessary?  I’m cautiously optimistic 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s not going to be like last year. I don’t think the panthers are the worst team in the NFL this year. 

But this is still probably a bottom 10 roster talent wise and I think we need to prepare for another bad season, but the silver lining is this team might show some real promise going into 2025

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lmao said:

No idea if it’s been mentioned by anyone, but I’ll be interested to see how the offense looks against not only 1st team defenders but post-first-10-scripted-plays.  How will Canales perform when adjustments are necessary?  I’m cautiously optimistic 

The field goal drive before halftime gave me optimism.   Players seemed to be on the same page, looked disciplined and knew what to do.  And that was with one of the worst 3rd string QBs in the league. I know I shouldn’t be surprised that a professional football team looked professional but I was.  No need for the DBO sign on that one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My god, an entire season of historically awful football is fogotten like grains of sand on the wind by the same crowd anointing the new hope on one preseason drive against the Bills 2nd/3rd string defenders, which also required a 4th conversion.  
 

Yall can drink the kool aid I’ll keeping pitching my tent in the prove it campground.  
 

Stir the pot take: Plummer looked better, with less….by a mile.

Edited by Newtcase
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...