Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread

KingKucci

By KingKucci,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Georgia is going to ruin CRA's day as they maul Clemson.

Even Saban picked Clemson.  That 13.5 spread was too much. Like I said earlier in the week. 

but unlike Saban, Imma tell you right now as the noon drinks flow through my body…Clemson bout to shock the world!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I’m interested to see what Weigman looks like tonight. Leonard a bit too. Allar has the size but boy did he ever not look the part last year. Unless Allar somehow did a 180 then he ain’t worth watching 

Although after watching Bo Nix at Auburn I would’ve bet my life that he’d never go 1st round 

Allar looked bad, but there wasn’t much around him to work with. I could see him as a Josh Allen or AR type prospect. He still needs to play better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Even Saban picked Clemson.  That 13.5 spread was too much. Like I said earlier in the week. 

but unlike Saban, Imma tell you right now as the noon drinks flow through my body…Clemson bout to shock the world!! 

Of course Saban picked one of his guys and against his biggest rival.

That said, I wouldn't mind the upset.

Edited by jayboogieman
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, CRA said:

Even Saban picked Clemson.  That 13.5 spread was too much. Like I said earlier in the week. 

but unlike Saban, Imma tell you right now as the noon drinks flow through my body…Clemson bout to shock the world!! 

Saban picked Georgia.  Pulling for Clemson but Georgia covers IMO

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...