Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's about more than just QB and superstars, man. Miami's defense is awful. They don't have much room for error on offense. I've seen how that usually works out over the course of a full season. You're almost always gonna take a couple of unexpected Ls because your offense has an off day, turnovers, or just a bad break or two. You get too dazzled by star power.

The defence gave up 3 points (and realistically should have pitched a shutout in the second half if Diaz had any balls and went for it) in the second half. 

We went on a 34-3 run. 

It's not a good defence (because the secondary isn't very good [or they're very young]), but it just needs to get a few stops a game and we win. 

And if you ask me the O has had a few off days already - there's just so many ways we can beat you that we score enough anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Dabo and thinking don't really go hand in hand. He's a recruiter and motivator. He ain't gonna beat anybody outwitting them on Saturday. Which honestly is fine. A lot of great college coaches are like that.

At very least, one of his assistants should have told him, hey coach, being down by 11 is better than being down by 12.  

Didn't matter anyway.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

The defence gave up 3 points (and realistically should have pitched a shutout in the second half if Diaz had any balls and went for it) in the second half. 

We went on a 34-3 run. 

It's not a good defence (because the secondary isn't very good [or they're very young]), but it just needs to get a few stops a game and we win. 

And if you ask me the O has had a few off days already - there's just so many ways we can beat you that we score enough anyway. 

I'm rooting for y'all. I've just seen how these style of teams usually play out. The margin of error is slim.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The best QB in a conference and the best QB in the nation oftentimes doesn't win the conference or the national championship. You always act like a 13 year old girl about this stuff. Muh superstars!!! LOL

I'd argue best O in the nation - certainly the best O in the ACC.

Best RB room, best OL room, best TE room. Arguably the best WR room too. We have the best DL room in the ACC too, for what it's worth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

They better enjoy it. Whoever wins the ACC is gonna get exposed in tbe playoffs. This conference is just not as talented as other conferences. These ACC games are just not the same as other conferences. Bad defenses, missed tackles, offenses scoring at will. Just terrible!

Have you watched ANY other games this year?

I just suffered through Georgia v Florida. It was a literal pillow fight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

They better enjoy it. Whoever wins the ACC is gonna get exposed in tbe playoffs. This conference is just not as talented as other conferences. These ACC games are just not the same as other conferences. Bad defenses, missed tackles, offenses scoring at will. Just terrible!

The Big12 is no better. Honestly you have the SEC and the Big10 outside of that the conferences are weak…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I think he gave up on winning the game a while ago - he was trying to keep the score respectable. 

At the time, he still had a slight chance to win.  Would have cut the lead to 11 with 6 minutes left.   I think he just didn't think it thru.  Of course, following that play, Clemson gave up an easy td, so it became irrelevant.  But at the time, it didn't make much sense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...