Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

Beamer smoking that crack rock post game.  Sellers isn’t the best player in the country.  He was the NFL version of The Golden Calf of Bristol out there today.  I mean props to his running.  Clemson couldn’t put him on the ground.   But that’s not good QB play.  Just a tank that is lined up at QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

If anything S.C. beat themselves with bad fumbles on the move. S.C. dominated the 4th.

SC also got 2 big questionable calls that took Clemson out while threatening to put up points in big moments. 

I mean, it wasn’t like it was a bad snap turnover where yall shot yourselves in the foot.  Clemson made plays there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

SC also got 2 pretty questionable calls that took Clemson out while threatening to put up points in big moments. 

I mean, it wasn’t like it was a bad snap turnover where yall shot yourselves in the foot.  Clemson made plays there. 

 

I mean that was a fumble, not even questionable. Cade pitched it back and the running back didn't control it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jaxel said:

I mean that was a fumble, not even questionable. Cade pitched it back and the running back didn't control it.

He controlled it enough to attempt to complete the play and lateral the WR while down.  Call on the field was down.  

Catch before the half.   No clue how you reverse that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

He controlled it enough to attempt to complete the play and lateral the WR while down.  Call on the field was down.  

Catch before the half.   No clue how you reverse that. 

Well the review determined other wise, and the play was call down because of Cades knee not the running back. The RB was fumbling around that ball till he hit the ground, thus it popped up so easily.

Edited by Jaxel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every couple years SC manages to find a way to narrowly beat Clemson.  That was a good game to watch.  You could feel that outcome coming though at the end early on.  

Came down to QBs late.  Sellers one man showed it.  Cade crumbled and panicked.    Ready for the end of the Cade era.  Hope that was the end of it.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Every couple years SC manages to find a way to narrowly beat Clemson.  That was a good game to watch.  You could feel that outcome coming though at the end early on.  

Came down to QBs late.  Sellers one man showed it.  Cade crumbled and panicked.    Ready for the end of the Cade era.  Hope that was the end of it.  

There's a lot of negative QB recruiting ammo for opposing coaches after DJU and Cade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was real disappointed in SC's secondary or very impressed with Klubnik and their WRs-  however that goes - because Clemson was eating. And not allowing SC to do anything on the ground except Sellers breaking out. Until late. 

I watched a few 4th quarters this year and Sellers is a badass. His passing will be fine with some more time, I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...