Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

Beamer smoking that crack rock post game.  Sellers isn’t the best player in the country.  He was the NFL version of The Golden Calf of Bristol out there today.  I mean props to his running.  Clemson couldn’t put him on the ground.   But that’s not good QB play.  Just a tank that is lined up at QB. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

If anything S.C. beat themselves with bad fumbles on the move. S.C. dominated the 4th.

SC also got 2 big questionable calls that took Clemson out while threatening to put up points in big moments. 

I mean, it wasn’t like it was a bad snap turnover where yall shot yourselves in the foot.  Clemson made plays there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

SC also got 2 pretty questionable calls that took Clemson out while threatening to put up points in big moments. 

I mean, it wasn’t like it was a bad snap turnover where yall shot yourselves in the foot.  Clemson made plays there. 

 

I mean that was a fumble, not even questionable. Cade pitched it back and the running back didn't control it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jaxel said:

I mean that was a fumble, not even questionable. Cade pitched it back and the running back didn't control it.

He controlled it enough to attempt to complete the play and lateral the WR while down.  Call on the field was down.  

Catch before the half.   No clue how you reverse that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

He controlled it enough to attempt to complete the play and lateral the WR while down.  Call on the field was down.  

Catch before the half.   No clue how you reverse that. 

Well the review determined other wise, and the play was call down because of Cades knee not the running back. The RB was fumbling around that ball till he hit the ground, thus it popped up so easily.

Edited by Jaxel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every couple years SC manages to find a way to narrowly beat Clemson.  That was a good game to watch.  You could feel that outcome coming though at the end early on.  

Came down to QBs late.  Sellers one man showed it.  Cade crumbled and panicked.    Ready for the end of the Cade era.  Hope that was the end of it.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Every couple years SC manages to find a way to narrowly beat Clemson.  That was a good game to watch.  You could feel that outcome coming though at the end early on.  

Came down to QBs late.  Sellers one man showed it.  Cade crumbled and panicked.    Ready for the end of the Cade era.  Hope that was the end of it.  

There's a lot of negative QB recruiting ammo for opposing coaches after DJU and Cade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was real disappointed in SC's secondary or very impressed with Klubnik and their WRs-  however that goes - because Clemson was eating. And not allowing SC to do anything on the ground except Sellers breaking out. Until late. 

I watched a few 4th quarters this year and Sellers is a badass. His passing will be fine with some more time, I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok--I have seen some sample items, and I would like to see something (if possible) measures on field intelligence--maybe how quickly you can grasp a playbook or absorb film session adjustments...Back when we had Morrison as team president and Hurney as GM, I offered to assess (as part of my research in education requirement at a University) emotional intelligence and learning styles of players to help coaches teach more effectively.  Morrison loved it and contacted me about it.  Hurney was not interested, and it fell through the cracks.  My pitch?  If only 50% of first-rounders become successful NFL players and that number drops significantly, can you tell me that you are effectively measuring talent?  Morrison thought it was a good point and wanted to do something that might improve long-term success rates--that would impact the cap management, etc.  Marty, according to Morrison, said he was not interested at this time and if so, he would want a football guy to do it.  (I told Morrison that I played in college and Hurney, a sports reporter at one time, did not. He told me that Hurney played as a Guard in college--who knew?) Any way, about that time, Morrison left (2017) and the idea was dropped.  I reached back out a year later or so to Marty was still not interested.  A few days later, his wife accused him of assault or something, so I dropped it.
    • Pretty sure they still do the Wonderlic they just don't publicly release the scores.
    • I just thought he was under the radar--but thanks for opening our eyes to him.  I think we should have better measures for intelligence--such as reaction time, angles, etc. Legette is raw as heck, for example, and his RAS was very high.  We used to do the Wonderlic (which was not great) but to know how effectively a player makes on field decisions would be great.  
×
×
  • Create New...