Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Things that shouldn’t be a surprise


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Carolina is horrible and that should not be a surprise.  It was plain as day before kickoff 

1.  Bryce Young isn’t a NFL QB

2. Bryce doesn’t fit a Canales O.  Combining a bad QB and putting him in a O he doesn’t fit is the textbook recipe to stink 

3.  Canales shouldn’t be calling plays.  He needs to learn to be a HC.  He was a 1 year meh OC, this ain’t an Andy Reid scenario where a HC can take on that load.  He isn’t even good at that. 

4.  We don’t have a real OC.  A repeated pattern under Tepper.  None of his 3 new coaching eras have featured a real OC in year 1. 

5.  We didn’t play and rep this O in the preseason.  I series vs backups was always nonsense.  It’s a brand new O with parts that don’t fit.   It needed more work than any O in the NFL

6.  All our pass rush left 

it can always get worse.  That’s certainly what this season looks to prove 

What NFL offence does Bryce fit? Serious question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

What NFL offence does Bryce fit? Serious question.

That is the thing. I never got an answer, asking what tool did he have that was above NFL average… only something else. I don’t want to say no one, but I don’t remember getting a tool specific rebuttal. A bunch of ‘it’s good enough’? More that. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Carolina is horrible and that should not be a surprise.  It was plain as day before kickoff 

1.  Bryce Young isn’t a NFL QB

2. Bryce doesn’t fit a Canales O.  Combining a bad QB and putting him in a O he doesn’t fit is the textbook recipe to stink 

3.  Canales shouldn’t be calling plays.  He needs to learn to be a HC.  He was a 1 year meh OC, this ain’t an Andy Reid scenario where a HC can take on that load.  He isn’t even good at that. 

4.  We don’t have a real OC.  A repeated pattern under Tepper.  None of his 3 new coaching eras have featured a real OC in year 1. 

5.  We didn’t play and rep this O in the preseason.  I series vs backups was always nonsense.  It’s a brand new O with parts that don’t fit.   It needed more work than any O in the NFL

6.  All our pass rush left 

it can always get worse.  That’s certainly what this season looks to prove 

7. Sam Darnold played like a Pro Bowl QB with a competent NFL head coach

I said this at the time, and I’ll repeat it again, cutting Wilks and Darnold loose instead of doubling down on the success of that year was stupid. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, strato said:

That is the thing. I never got an answer, asking what tool did he have that was above NFL average… only something else. I don’t want to say no one, but I don’t remember getting a tool specific rebuttal. A bunch of ‘it’s good enough’? More that. 

Above NFL average?

My dude, what tool does he have that is even NFL average?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, strato said:

That is the thing. I never got an answer, asking what tool did he have that was above NFL average… only something else. I don’t want to say no one, but I don’t remember getting a tool specific rebuttal. A bunch of ‘it’s good enough’? More that. 

Supposedly he has a brain and kind for the game but I have yet to see it last year and this year with some offensive line improvement even a little I still don't see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

Supposedly he has a brain and kind for the game but I have yet to see it last year and this year with some offensive line improvement even a little I still don't see it

Yeah and that isn’t a physical trait. It is no good without the physical ability to take advantage of it. 
I bet his footwork went to hell today. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

7. Sam Darnold played like a Pro Bowl QB with a competent NFL head coach

I said this at the time, and I’ll repeat it again, cutting Wilks and Darnold loose instead of doubling down on the success of that year was stupid. 

It still bothers me to this day. Darnold made plays, he would sometimes sh** the bed and we weren’t going to the SB, but he passed the eye test of what an NFL qb looked like. He had leadership skills, and you could tell his teammates respected him. 

Look at those tapes of the Wilks locker rooms after a win. Team. Energy. Have we seen even one video since the Bryce era? 

Nobody respects Bryce, and it shows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gapanthersfan said:

It still bothers me to this day. Darnold made plays, he would sometimes sh** the bed and we weren’t going to the SB, but he passed the eye test of what an NFL qb looked like. He had leadership skills, and you could tell his teammates respected him. 

Look at those tapes of the Wilks locker rooms after a win. Team. Energy. Have we seen even one video since the Bryce era? 

Nobody respects Bryce, and it shows. 

It’s looking bleak right now but no one will talk about it. I’m not sure why the media can’t be honest about Young but he has been worse than Jimmy Clausen with more weapons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

That is the thing. I never got an answer, asking what tool did he have that was above NFL average… only something else. I don’t want to say no one, but I don’t remember getting a tool specific rebuttal. A bunch of ‘it’s good enough’? More that. 

He was pitched as having field vision and playmaking ability that was far above average. The reality is that it's below average. 

So when you couple that with below average physical abilities then it quickly becomes obvious he is a below average QB.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just chasing targets is a fools game. Chase averaged 85 yrds and .76 TDs per game his first year and 87.16 yrds, and .75 TD's per game his second year. Statistically the same. NOT an improvement. Puka saw no increase either. Yes, Waddle's went down because he had to share targets with another receiver - just like TMac will have to share targets with Coker next year so you have actually just made my point concerning Coker. Olave saw an increase in targets but Carr replaced Dalton and even with the increase in targets, his production was pretty flat (83 extra yards and 1 more TD for the entire year). And Wilson's number did increase but the Jets replaced the other two receivers and their contribution was significantly down from Davis's and Moore's. Again, nothing in those numbers should lead anyone to believe there will be a big leap for Tmac next year.       
    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
×
×
  • Create New...