Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yes we will have #1 in 2025


PantherChris
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Khaki Lackey said:

Our front office might give up picks to trade down 

Our needs.  Like in a big big way.  Our needs going into 2025 look like this

 

WR

Corner

Edge rusher

and most importantly QB

and thats assuming Icky is working out

 

Man we are fuged for a couple of years so a trade back seems like the only option if a team wants to give us a kings ransome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Our needs.  Like in a big big way.  Our needs going into 2025 look like this

 

WR

Corner

Edge rusher

and most importantly QB

and thats assuming Icky is working out

 

Man we are fuged for a couple of years so a trade back seems like the only option if a team wants to give us a kings ransome

Honestly, it's not that dier. A good QB hides a lot of issues. The Texans were looked at as having the worse roster ever, got Stroud, good again. The bears are stacked, but Caleb playing poorly. Suddenly they are lacking talent. All comes back to one player.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

That's why a trade back isn't a bad idea

ALWAYS depends on what is offered and who is available - but definitely a maybe.  At least right now the 2nd rounder we got from the Rams looks like a great pickup since they have lost  both their Pro Bowl WR's temporarily.  And the 2025 crop of QB's ain't lookin too great...certainly not a clear cut top 5 pick at the moment.  Trade down for a monster haul, bridge with someone else, 2026-2029 we stockpile and dominate the 2030's!  Such a sad story considering it is 2024......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stingray3030 said:

ALWAYS depends on what is offered and who is available - but definitely a maybe.  At least right now the 2nd rounder we got from the Rams looks like a great pickup since they have lost  both their Pro Bowl WR's temporarily.  And the 2025 crop of QB's ain't lookin too great...certainly not a clear cut top 5 pick at the moment.  Trade down for a monster haul, bridge with someone else, 2026-2029 we stockpile and dominate the 2030's!  Such a sad story considering it is 2024......

There might no longer be a fan base if we have to wait till 2030.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...