Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Dolphins are shopping Ted Ginn Jr.

Sam Mills Fan

By Sam Mills Fan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

It would definitely depend on the asking price, but he would make a great speed wide reciever/ great return man........ I know our Panthers are ultra-conservative, but a dual threat guy makes a lot of sense right now. That way we could draft a taller possession reciever like Benn or Thomas assuming they are available...ahhh Hell I'm going into Madden mode again

Just so I'm clear the Panthers will not trade for him before the draft, by that time he will probably already be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Smith wants someone faster.

Is Ginn faster? check.

Meets youth requirement?check

return man? check

can run a go route pretty good?check, better than the one we always threw to Moose.

If cheap, he is worth a look. He ain't a good WR, but his skill set actually fits pretty well into some of our needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

i'd rather not.

thanks, though.

only on kick returns would i be interested but i'd rather have someone that was a dual threat. he ain't that.

well, considering the last threat we had at return man was like 6 years ago (or whenever Smitty was fulltime)......I might be willing to settle for a one dimensional return man at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

All the debate is likely wasted. We aren't picking up anyone before the draft and likely scrubs afterwards. Unless he is free, I doubt we even look at him.

I tend to agree.....I was hoping his youth and cheapness could make Carolina break there general gameplan. I mean, at this point it might make a little more sense to have him on the roster than Jarrett. Both aren't proven to be good options, but Ginn has 4 more rec TDs, 2 rushing TD, 2 KR TD, and a PR TD......during the same time in the league. Granted, he got more opportunity but he is probably an upgrade on Jarrett's spot. Is young enough to go through this rebuilding and come out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Week 1 @JAX Grades

      By frankw · Posted

      I have no idea but I'll trust my own two eyes. He's still playing like one of the worst QB's in recent memory.
    • X-Clown
      I’m trying to be positive on Bryce Young, but….

      By X-Clown · Posted

      I don't play Madden anymore - but if they adjust ratings every week, they likely need to put his Awareness down to like a 5 out of 100 after that play and the other play where he couldn't decide whether or not to scramble or throw the ball and didn't really end up doing either one. 
    • theinstrumental
      Week 1 @JAX Grades

      By theinstrumental · Posted

      Just finished a re-watch of the game, and I can see how they back into "Bryce was fine, actually." You just have to be incredibly charitable to Bryce. The grade basically comes down to how much blame you assign to him for these plays: 1. The goal-line 4th-and-1 where the ball was snapped early. 2. The XL sideline toe-drag failure. 3. The left sideline Renfrow drop. 4. The second left sideline Renfrow missed connection (ugh). 5. The ball going through Dowdle's hands and getting picked. 6. The JT Sanders wheel-route drop. 7. The 4th-and-1 end-zone shot to T-Mac. If you put the drops on the receivers and massage his grade a little due to some quick pressures...sure, you get a passable grade. If you don't, then it looks pretty bad. But the only undeniably, balls-stupid, completely-on-him mistakes I remember right now were the fumble, the pick on the bootleg, and a spray or two. I'll just say that I don't really understand why everyone gets so upset about these grades. We all know they're pretty subjective and should really only be taken seriously over a sample size big enough to even some of these things out. It obviously matters that the offense looked like crap. But that'll all show up in the grades if that remains the case. Maybe they could be better about putting in a range? Like, they could go as low as a 30 or as high as an 80, depending on how you score those things, but they had to settle on something, so here's a 70. 
×
×
  • Create New...