Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Athletic/Diana Russini: What I'm Hearing - "Bryce is Done in Carolina"

Bear Hands

By Bear Hands,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

But what happens if our older vet QB gets hurt? Bryce is QB2 right now. He is more than likely playing again before the season is over IMO. 

This is why you shop him now and get someone else in asap.  I don't think (guessing--not sure) that you want to or can trade someone on IR---the other option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
uncfan888 Grand Master

uncfan888

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

Didn't see this in the first few posts, maybe someone else pointed it out already

Young admitted he was surprised by the move — he thought he had more time

YOU'RE IN YOUR SECOND SEASON. HOW MUCH MORE TIME DO YOU THINK YOU HAD TO GET WINS?

You see how long it took Jay z to build the dynasty

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I think we all know he is done in Carolina. You don't bench the #1 overall pick after 2 weeks. This was a Canales decision folks! He doesn't want Bryce as his future QB point blank.

 

Cowherd mentioned on his show Friday that his agent is already looking for trades. We both know this relationship is over.

 

 

Even the Panthers players believe it was Tepper per the article. 

literally everything point to it being Tepper

There is nothing that support it being Canales outside of folks trying manifest it being normal in Carolina suddenly.  It’s not.  It’s the same poo show

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, CRA said:

Even the Panthers players believe it was Tepper per the article. 

literally everything point to it being Tepper

There is nothing that support it being Canales outside of folks trying manifest it being normal in Carolina suddenly.  It’s not.  It’s the same poo show

I just read that article.

In regards to Tepper being the instigator, the article just says "even people on the Panthers". Doesn't say players. 

And what they said was "Too much change from Sunday to Monday". It's no more than an opinion of an employee. We don't know what they know. 

Though, as far as I am concerned whoever made the call to pull him, it is the right call. Wish they could have been that smart a year and a half ago.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, strato said:

I just read that article.

In regards to Tepper being the instigator, the article just says "even people on the Panthers". Doesn't say players. 

And what they said was "Too much change from Sunday to Monday". It's no more than an opinion of an employee. We don't know what they know. 

Though, as far as I am concerned whoever made the call to pull him, it is the right call. Wish they could have been that smart a year and a half ago.

 

on the Panthers means players to me.  Dan Morgan isn’t on the Panthers, Shaq Thompson is on on the Panthers 

it’s not an opinion. Canales loudly and clearly said Bryce was the dude Sunday post game.  He had his team bought into the long path.  It’s all he talked about for some time.  Theilen and everyone was there Sunday saying it.  What changed was Canales got called to the Monday Morning meeting and then did a 180.  And his tap dancing and non answers to a basic coaching decision (which could never admit to)….lets you know it was Tepper’s call.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, CRA said:

on the Panthers means players to me.  Dan Morgan isn’t on the Panthers, Shaq Thompson is on on the Panthers 

it’s not an opinion. Canales loudly and clearly said Bryce was the dude Sunday post game.  He had his team bought into the long path.  It’s all he talked about for some time.  Theilen and everyone was there Sunday saying it.  What changed was Canales got called to the Monday Morning meeting and then did a 180.  And his tap dancing and non answers to a basic coaching decision (which could never admit to)….lets you know it was Tepper’s call.  

'Too much' What's that? 

'Too much change from Sunday to Monday' is an opinion my friend.

An employee of some type stating their interpretation of how the thing went down. It might be right but it is a fact, that that is an opinion. 

Do you think she was getting her Hunger Games plot from players or people in the building, that are on the Panthers staff? I think her contacts are media types, people that work in the building and hear stuff. Could it have been a couple of fired coaches and cut players for that Hunger Games? Yeah could be that too. 

But she got her intel from people on the inside somewhere, and my guess is that is where it is coming from this time, in the building, without someone specifically saying what their role is. Could even be Gantt, easily.  

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CRA said:

on the Panthers means players to me.  Dan Morgan isn’t on the Panthers, Shaq Thompson is on on the Panthers 

it’s not an opinion. Canales loudly and clearly said Bryce was the dude Sunday post game.  He had his team bought into the long path.  It’s all he talked about for some time.  Theilen and everyone was there Sunday saying it.  What changed was Canales got called to the Monday Morning meeting and then did a 180.  And his tap dancing and non answers to a basic coaching decision (which could never admit to)….lets you know it was Tepper’s call.  

Do you think he was just doing “coach speak”? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...