Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera on Bryce Young Benching


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why are people so afraid to hurt Bryce’s feelings? I don’t get it. He is the same guy he was at Alabama. We tried training that out of him and it hasn’t worked, and that falls on his own preparation away from the facility and during the offseason, which he admittedly spent watching Netflix. 
 

It’s Bryce Young’s decision to get better or to not get better. The issue isn’t that he has changed since he left Alabama, the problem is that he has not changed since he left Alabama. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Why are people so afraid to hurt Bryce’s feelings? I don’t get it. He is the same guy he was at Alabama. We tried training that out of him and it hasn’t worked, and that falls on his own preparation away from the facility and during the offseason, which he admittedly spent watching Netflix. 
 

It’s Bryce Young’s decision to get better or to not get better. The issue isn’t that he has changed since he left Alabama, the problem is that he has not changed since he left Alabama. 

Because as a society mental health is a big deal and everyone wins a participation award

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, scpanther22 said:

Had a HOF QB, HOF TE, HOF LB,  All-Pro RB should have been a dynasty easy lol

I think Cam had a great year in 2015 but I do think, in hindsight, that he wasn’t as good as we all thought he was. He may have been a Top 15 QB most of his tenure but he had limitations in reading defenses and precision throws (different from accuracy). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TheBigKat said:

Because as a society mental health is a big deal and everyone wins a participation award

As a society, our mental health is what we say it is now.

Look at all the totally sane people out there doing totally sane poo, you have your proof. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...