Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers open practice window for 5 injured players


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I honestly thought he was the best RB in the draft. Just carolina was not player for him, given the needs and value. The RB is lower than the safety market, derrick henry was signed for 2 years at 16 million. Many others cases, but panthers used a prime spot on guy that may not play half the year with 3 other guys already here. just bad management.

It only makes sense if he goes prime jamaal charles. 

In terms of resource allocation to the position I agree with you completely and I've been saying that for years now. We'll just have to see how it shakes out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

Kneeland has 8 tackles 0 sacks. Kool-aid isn't even starting, Jenkins has 2 tackles 0 sacks. Our guy hasn't even played and is making the same impact of the guys you named lol. Getting the best RB in the draft but having to wait 5-6 weeks for him to play isn't bad at all. 

i didnt look at stats, just being honest form the draft time.

jenkins has missed games.

brooks has lost game snaps and reps, hes FARRR behind and will never reach the other names unless they get hurt. Hes behind on everything besides rehabbing. 

we'll see, he feels like a 2025 pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, frankw said:

In terms of resource allocation to the position I agree with you completely and I've been saying that for years now. We'll just have to see how it shakes out though.

You spend recourses to get GOOD PLAYERS which we don't have alot of right now no matter the position. We aren't in the position to pick and choose which positions we take just draft BPA and get as many good players as we can each draft.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

You spend recourses to get GOOD PLAYERS which we don't have alot of right now no matter the position. We aren't in the position to pick and choose which positions we take just draft BPA and get as many good players as we can each draft.

according to many brooks was clearly the highest player on their board and they were worried about dallas jumping up since jerrah said he was the best interview in 30 years. funny dallas still needs a RB or even two.

Im a value nerd, RB is down there with kickers currently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

You spend recourses to get GOOD PLAYERS which we don't have alot of right now no matter the position. We aren't in the position to pick and choose which positions we take just draft BPA and get as many good players as we can each draft.

Of course but when you have squandered resources the way we have the last few years on either bad to simply horrific investments when you trade up to acquire talent for a roster that is depleted across the board like ours you need to get results sooner rather than later. But he has to play this season. This is a crucial developmental season for a lot of young guys. If he can't go at all that is an unequivocal fail for the time being as far as grading the selection goes.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Brooks was very much a draft pick for next season. Chuba has developed into an excellent RB but he's gonna be a free agent and Miles Sanders can be cut in the offseason or possibly traded in-season. 

My opinion is this--a RB rarely earns the second contract--they peak around age 27.  If you recall, we drafted another Jonathan running back off the surgeon's table--Stewart.  He spent a lot of time on the exercise bike if you recall, and I would argue, even though he was successful as a player, he was not a value.  In my view, RBs are so plentiful and they hit the wall so quickly, I would not sign a RB to a pricey second contract.  Now, if anyone adopted my position, we will pay Brooks for 4 years to give us 3 years of productivity.  Furthermore,  Texas had/has a solid OL and passing game.  I am not sure that he will be as good without those two advantages....We shall see.  I would have rather seen us go a different direction with the second overall pick.  I hope he proves me wrong--I am not predicting that he will fail--and I think (with Sanders doing OK at times and Chuba) I would give him a few more weeks to heal.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TarHeel69 said:

I understand Wonnum had Quad surgery.  Just wondering if the team is being extra cautious or is he gonna be another vet coming in here to collect a check?  I'm a realist, I know he isn't going to fix the pass rush.

He had a setback during the rehabbing of that quad. He was on time for TC, but that was 2 months ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

My opinion is this--a RB rarely earns the second contract--they peak around age 27.  If you recall, we drafted another Jonathan running back off the surgeon's table--Stewart.  He spent a lot of time on the exercise bike if you recall, and I would argue, even though he was successful as a player, he was not a value.  In my view, RBs are so plentiful and they hit the wall so quickly, I would not sign a RB to a pricey second contract.  Now, if anyone adopted my position, we will pay Brooks for 4 years to give us 3 years of productivity.  Furthermore,  Texas had/has a solid OL and passing game.  I am not sure that he will be as good without those two advantages....We shall see.  I would have rather seen us go a different direction with the second overall pick.  I hope he proves me wrong--I am not predicting that he will fail--and I think (with Sanders doing OK at times and Chuba) I would give him a few more weeks to heal.

That along with the current RB market, its at the lowest its been % wise. Teams are paying WRs, OGs, DTs, dam near all spots minus ST before RBs.

 https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/year/2024/position/rb/sort/contract_value

 

3rd slot WRs are getting more. 

 

Sure you need good players, but Ill take a good Edge over elite Long snapper. 

Panthers should know this and take advantage, but like my friend said after the draft "Dan drafted like its still his playing era." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, MHS831 said:

My opinion is this--a RB rarely earns the second contract--they peak around age 27.  If you recall, we drafted another Jonathan running back off the surgeon's table--Stewart.  He spent a lot of time on the exercise bike if you recall, and I would argue, even though he was successful as a player, he was not a value.  In my view, RBs are so plentiful and they hit the wall so quickly, I would not sign a RB to a pricey second contract.  Now, if anyone adopted my position, we will pay Brooks for 4 years to give us 3 years of productivity.  Furthermore,  Texas had/has a solid OL and passing game.  I am not sure that he will be as good without those two advantages....We shall see.  I would have rather seen us go a different direction with the second overall pick.  I hope he proves me wrong--I am not predicting that he will fail--and I think (with Sanders doing OK at times and Chuba) I would give him a few more weeks to heal.

To me, his selection falls under the 'sell out for Bryce's sake' draft philosophy we had adopted. The catching and route running in addition to the ball carrying was the motivation for targeting him. 

I'd have rather not signed both guards to that huge money and found a real good prospect. But I understood what was going on. 

At the time, I saw it as important for Young to have all the excuses thoroughly countered so things would  be clear - for whoever wasn't clear. So wasn't bitching like a lot of people were over no center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...