Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tea Leaves: WR Johnson Leaves this week


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, thennek said:

I mid-round pick that the Panthers will chose a player that will never contribute to the team.  Trading away good players for draft picks only work if you know how to draft....which the Panthers do not.  However, the Panthers probably have no choice if DJ no longer wants to be here.  Who can blame him.

Well that's it. You can't really fit him in the trading away good players bin because he isn't our player in the future. 10 games of a guy that doesn't want to be here anymore is what we'd be trading. 

Do I wish it had been a better outcome where we'd be keeping him? Yeah but if he is copping the 'tude you have to move him out, almost like Robbie got moved. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, frankw said:

If we can swing a 4th for Diontae I'll be very pleasantly surprised. 5th seems like the best return given what other players have been going for.

Naw that’s just stupid it’s more about the need and necessity he’s younger than DA and DHop. He’s 28 just turned it 3 months ago, they’re basically both 32 with lots and lots of miles on both WR. It’s not the same, he actually would produce equivalent to each but I’d say a little more bc of how easily he gets open and his YAC ability and his lack of wear and tear.
He's worth a three for Dallas to be competitive in their own division and the NFC. He’s worth a 3 if you’re old and rich and want to see success for your team before you have to leave this earth. He’s worth a three if you’re San Fran a stacked team who’s down a sharp route running WR that could help them get back to the big game. It’s all about necessity who wants to be able to compete with the top teams as of right now you’re going to have to overpay for that final piece, happens all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Shocker said:

Nice presentation bad logic

Well, when you are talking about Jerry Jones, are you really going to play the logic card?  We shall see--and it is a long shot but we who stick our necks out get that there will always be criticism from safe zones--but Jones is going to be desperate and there are few WRs he can pursue who are on the block, have Johnson's skills, and low salary.  I can't imagine any other WR right now checking those boxes.  Now, since he went all in with some contracts, he is cap strapped, and at 3-4, he is desperate.  Would a third rounder be a lot?  Yes--a ton--but any negotiator looks at the situation and if Jerry comes shopping, he will pay a premium price--Morgan will know what is in the pot and what cards Jones is holding.   Comparing this deal to other deals is discounting the situation.  If I am Jones, I would give up a third to save a season in which I am otherwise fully invested.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

So basically, whatever we get for him is the value we got for Donte Jackson. 

I could live with trading Donte Jackson for a 3rd. There is just going to have to be a team desperate enough to give up a 3rd for him. 

And that team is Dallas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Crystal Ball GIF by Fall Out Boy

Seriously--there are other teams who could take a shot at him.  LA Chargers are in the mix, and someone mentioned Detroit---that is a good option as well.  Detroit does not have the fire power to beat KC now, but Johnson would put them in the conversation.  Washington is another possibility.  I am not thinking we get more than a fourth or fifth in these scenarios.

Another idea someone mentioned was that Jones packages a deal for Hubbard and Johnson.  If he talks to their agents and learns that he could sign them both to extensions/new contracts, then if I were Jones, that is what I would do.

Gonna be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Well, when you are talking about Jerry Jones, are you really going to play the logic card?  We shall see--and it is a long shot but we who stick our necks out get that there will always be criticism from safe zones--but Jones is going to be desperate and there are few WRs he can pursue who are on the block, have Johnson's skills, and low salary.  I can't imagine any other WR right now checking those boxes.  Now, since he went all in with some contracts, he is cap strapped, and at 3-4, he is desperate.  Would a third rounder be a lot?  Yes--a ton--but any negotiator looks at the situation and if Jerry comes shopping, he will pay a premium price--Morgan will know what is in the pot and what cards Jones is holding.   Comparing this deal to other deals is discounting the situation.  If I am Jones, I would give up a third to save a season in which I am otherwise fully invested.

 

I wish you were right and the GM for that matter.  We got absolutely nothing for him basically.  Sad

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Seriously--there are other teams who could take a shot at him.  LA Chargers are in the mix, and someone mentioned Detroit---that is a good option as well.  Detroit does not have the fire power to beat KC now, but Johnson would put them in the conversation.  Washington is another possibility.  I am not thinking we get more than a fourth or fifth in these scenarios.

Another idea someone mentioned was that Jones packages a deal for Hubbard and Johnson.  If he talks to their agents and learns that he could sign them both to extensions/new contracts, then if I were Jones, that is what I would do.

Gonna be interesting.

Baltimore Ravens baby!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hear you and I have said the same thing at times, but blanket statements are accurate part of the time at best.  I have also coached kids who had the "tools" but they were slow and unproductive on the field--and a few adjustments to the scheme or teaching techniques, and the light comes on.  We call them "late bloomers."  Based on my limited experience, it should be called "coaching."  As a former coach, if you gave me kids with the tools and I could not get them to perform at the level of their ability, then I have failed.  The coaches know this, so their timetables to win may be shorter than the time they have to develop a player--I think a lot of talent goes down the disposal, which is why the success rate for drafted players is so low. In my view, based on my career as a professor and researcher, my job is to produce successful people for the workplace.   I use data to identify central problems and I use my relationships with my students to strengthen weaknesses.  I have a limited amount of time to do this before a decision is made about their development.  In this case, I would look at the variables (data and the situational influences unique to this individual that may have stunted growth) and not the ineffective player as the center of the problem.  The team has already interviewed him, talked to his college coaches, measured him, etc. So I would minimize the assumption that the kid is the problem and look at his system of support and teaching strategies.  Nobody wants to admit THEY might be the problem.  To blame a first-rounder for failing, you have to admit either you did not properly identify the prospect's potential (which is your job) or you were unable to prepare that prospect (with all the tools that got him the job) to succeed (also your job).  So are we going to blame the 24-year-old kid with all the tools to succeed for sucking or are we going to take responsibility for his success as his mentors and teachers?  
    • i was hoping they might bring robinson back but he went to the darkside.  They will need to sign a free agent as Evero does not like to start rookies.
    • Flexibility. If they don’t work out we simply walk away. If they look great we have the first crack at extending them. 
×
×
  • Create New...