Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

15/25, 126


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

Win or lose, there will always be negativity about the QB play. At least Bryce didn't lose the game for us like he has done in the past with costly turnovers. We are a bottom dwelling team and we just beat other bottom dwelling teams. Today's win was a TEAM win, offense scored enough, defense got turnovers when it mattered, and special teams won it. Just enjoy the win. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Manna said:

I’m on the replace Bryce train but will give credit where it’s due. His demeanor and willingness to push the ball has definitely changed since his benching. 

Thank you! That is a fair take.

I genuinely think some of these posters must be miserable in their personal lives... they just can't be happy and they are determined to drag everyone else dowm

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Other than Coker on 3rd down, where are all these bad misses??

The ball was on time and where it needed to be most of the time. Zero turnovers. Got a TD taken away for bs

I don't know why some people are still Panthers fans.

I get not thinking Bryce is the future.

Some of this hate is straight irrational and insufferable though... it just is.

I'm done again for the day.

It's insane Panthers fans happy about a win cant even post without being attacked by this nonsense

You're making yourselves the victims - nobody is attacking you, you're diving in front of any comment that suggests Young played poorly like it's a live hand grenade. 

The defence and Hubbard won this game. The Giants thought so little of Young that they punted the ball back to us on 4th and manageable with 3+ minutes left on the clock - and they were right because they got it back with 2:30 on the clock. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CarolinaRideorDie said:

Win or lose, there will always be negativity about the QB play. At least Bryce didn't lose the game for us like he has done in the past with costly turnovers. We are a bottom dwelling team and we just beat other bottom dwelling teams. Today's win was a TEAM win, offense scored enough, defense got turnovers when it mattered, and special teams won it. Just enjoy the win. 

100%. We are not magically going to not be a bottom dwelling team this year.

The rational (and IMHO) healthy think to do is hope Bryce and the rookies continue to show improvement and we are competitive.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldhamA said:

You're making yourselves the victims - nobody is attacking you, you're diving in front of any comment that suggests Young played poorly like it's a live hand grenade. 

The defence and Hubbard won this game. The Giants thought so little of Young that they punted the ball back to us on 4th and manageable with 3+ minutes left on the clock - and they were right because they got it back with 2:30 on the clock. 

You didn't even attempt to answer the question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

If this was Patrick Mahomes playing with 3 rookies and down 2 Olineman, the announcers would be reminding the audience of that every 5 minutes...

I want to engage here, and I'm definitely not on the Bryce is the savior bandwagon, but some of this stuff is objectively stupid given the context and just insufferable.

I am proud of this team. We lose this game every single time the last 5 seasons

 

Patrick Mahomes won the Super Bowl with that type of skill position performance last year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Seltzer said:

100%. We are not magically going to not be a bottom dwelling team this year.

The rational (and IMHO) healthy think to do is hope Bryce and the rookies continue to show improvement and we are competitive.

Agreed. Can you imagine if we lost to the Saints and the Giants, what that would do to team culture and confidence? It would be a disaster and a huge setback. We were the worst team last year, hands down. Winning and beating bad teams is showing progress and letting the guys know that they can play and win. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...