Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who wants Bryce to fail?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, NAS said:

Just raise your hand here so you don’t have to ruin every positive thread when Panthers win. 

It’s one thing to be critical of Bryce when he deserves it but some of the hate on this board is just weird.  Stop trying to sugar coat it and admit you don’t want Bryce to do anything well because you have moved on forever and are looking to confirm your bias regarding his NFL future 

I wanted him benched too but every time he steps on the field I want him to succeed and do well. He still has a long ways to go but I think he can be a Brock Purdy type of QB with the right pieces around him.  

FAIL HES ALREADY FAILED HIS CEILING IS AVERAGE BACKUP JUST QUIT WITH THIS CRAP. 

 

 

 

126 YARDS PASSING AGAIST ONE OF A FEW TEAMS ACTUALLY WORSE THAN US

 

 

BROCK PURDY WAS MR IRRELEVANT BRYCEY WAS #1 LMFAO IMAGINE COMPARING A #1 TO THE LAST LIKE OH HE COULD BECOME LOL

 

Edited by PantherChris
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

FAIL HES ALREADY FAILED HIS CEILING IS AVERAGE BACKUP JUST QUIT WITH THIS CRAP. 

 

126 YARDS PASSING AGAIST ONE OF A FEW TEAMS ACTUALLY WORSE THAN US

Giants defense was ranked 9th against the pass.  Their offense sucks but their defense is much better than ours

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Very few actively want him to fail. But many recognize his very limited ceiling and feel that applauding 125 yards against the Giants, or any of these recent weeks, as 'improvement' is ludicrous. Sure, it's better than he was, but dude was playing D3 football in the NFL those first weeks of this season.

I see Caleb Williams playing like crap with much better weapons so not sure what stats Bryce should have throwing to rookies. I judge his progress mainly on his confidence in the pocket and going through progressions. Looks much improved, the stats will come when the rookies aren’t rookies anymore 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 8
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Very few actively want him to fail. But many recognize his very limited ceiling and feel that applauding 125 yards against the Giants, or any of these recent weeks, as 'improvement' is ludicrous. Sure, it's better than he was, but dude was playing D3 football in the NFL those first weeks of this season.

Bingo. 

He was crowned played of the game when Chuba clearly put that offense on his back and carried them down the field over and over again.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If your best game was 126 yards passing vs the Giants then I don't need to root for you to fail.

 

You already failed if this is one of your better games as a pro. Talk to me after we get humbled by the Chiefs next week.

Who said this is his best game?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...