Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance


trucpfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

If true, that's just disrespectful. And intentional.

Oh this is very true and Very disrespectful, and I'm not bashing Bryce but this is a good example of the Not For Long league. You can't underperform 2-3 seasons and expect to have a job. His leash is just as short better lock in these next few games.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I’m not sure how to think about this one. Our number one draft pick Bryce Young’s is starting to show signs of a life. 

My first thought is, why would we want another team’s reject.   If the Panthers style of play is the same as the New York Giants style of play then, not just No but, Hell No!

I did not like the way, Andy Dalton played at New Orleans. Daniel might be good as a back up quarterback. I think careful consideration must be made before making him a starter over Bryce Young.

The NFC south is still up for grabs.  The first place team is what, six wins and four losses. I am glad I do not have to make these decisions.

Edited by Green-Ghost
Spell Check made incorrect change
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he does not have to pass through waivers as a 4 year vet. That makes him a vested vet and he is released outright to free agency. 
So I don’t think there are contractual obligations attached. But I am frequently wrong about poo. 
 

This is too sudden for us to get involved I think, at least right away. Now watch that be wrong too. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...