Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance


trucpfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

If true, that's just disrespectful. And intentional.

Oh this is very true and Very disrespectful, and I'm not bashing Bryce but this is a good example of the Not For Long league. You can't underperform 2-3 seasons and expect to have a job. His leash is just as short better lock in these next few games.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I’m not sure how to think about this one. Our number one draft pick Bryce Young’s is starting to show signs of a life. 

My first thought is, why would we want another team’s reject.   If the Panthers style of play is the same as the New York Giants style of play then, not just No but, Hell No!

I did not like the way, Andy Dalton played at New Orleans. Daniel might be good as a back up quarterback. I think careful consideration must be made before making him a starter over Bryce Young.

The NFC south is still up for grabs.  The first place team is what, six wins and four losses. I am glad I do not have to make these decisions.

Edited by Green-Ghost
Spell Check made incorrect change
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he does not have to pass through waivers as a 4 year vet. That makes him a vested vet and he is released outright to free agency. 
So I don’t think there are contractual obligations attached. But I am frequently wrong about poo. 
 

This is too sudden for us to get involved I think, at least right away. Now watch that be wrong too. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...